CVE-2025-41658
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCODESYS Runtime Toolkit-based products may expose sensitive files to local low-privileged operating system users due to default file permissions.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCODESYS Runtime Toolkit-based products have default file permissions that allow local low-privileged operating system users to read sensitive files that should be restricted. This is a local information disclosure vulnerability where sensitive configuration, credentials, or runtime data files are accessible to unprivileged users due to overly permissive default access controls.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Locate CODESYS Runtime Toolkit installation directorySearch for common CODESYS installation paths such as C:\Program Files\CODESYS or /opt/codesys, and check for directories named 'CODESYS' or containing 'Runtime' in the program files or installation folders.Affected if CODESYS Runtime Toolkit is installed and the installation directory exists on the system.
-
Identify sensitive configuration and credential filesWithin the CODESYS installation directory, look for files with extensions such as .xml, .cfg, .ini, .xml, .json, .key, .pem, .crt, or files named config, settings, credentials, passwords, or plc logic files (*.project, *.library).Affected if Sensitive configuration files, credential files, or runtime data files exist within the CODESYS installation directory.
-
Check file permissions on sensitive filesUse OS-native commands: on Windows run 'icacls <file>' or right-click properties > Security tab; on Linux run 'ls -la <file>' or 'getfacl <file>'. Examine which users or groups have Read access.Affected if File permissions show that unprivileged users (such as Users group on Windows, or world/others on Linux) have Read permissions on sensitive files.
-
Verify unprivileged user access to sensitive filesIf possible, attempt to read the sensitive files using a low-privileged test account or by running commands as a standard user (e.g., 'runas /user:StandardUser type <file>' on Windows or 'su - standarduser -c "cat <file>"' on Linux).Affected if A low-privileged operating system user can successfully open and read files containing configuration, credentials, or runtime data.
-
Compare installed version to any known affected versionsCheck the CODESYS product version by looking for version information in the installation directory, registry (Windows), or by running 'codesys --version' if available. Compare against vendor advisory if version ranges become available.Affected if The installed version falls within any version range the vendor identifies as affected (when such information becomes available).
A user is affected if CODESYS Runtime Toolkit is installed and unprivileged local users can read sensitive configuration, credential, or runtime data files due to overly permissive default file permissions.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReview and restrict file permissions on sensitive files and directories within the CODESYS Runtime Toolkit installation to ensure only authorized privileged users or processes can access them. Apply the principle of least privilege to file system access controls.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-41658 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-41658 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data