Classic Buffer OverflowWeakness · CWE-120

CVE-2025-41707

MEDIUM · 5.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-10-14
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
62/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The websocket handler is vulnerable to a denial of service condition. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send a crafted websocket message to trigger the issue without affecting the core functionality.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The websocket handler in this application contains a vulnerability that allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to trigger a denial of service condition by sending a crafted websocket message. The attack specifically impacts the websocket handler's availability without affecting the application's core functionality.

MitigationApply vendor-supplied patches when available. In the interim, consider implementing rate limiting on websocket endpoints and deploying a web application firewall (WAF) to filter potentially malicious websocket messages.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify websocket endpoint exposure
    Review your application's network configuration and routing tables to determine if websocket endpoints (ws:// or wss://) are publicly accessible or exposed to untrusted networks. Check load balancer, reverse proxy, or API gateway configurations for websocket route definitions.
    Affected if Websocket endpoints are reachable from untrusted/network-facing interfaces without authentication controls
  2. Verify websocket handler is enabled
    Check application configuration files, startup parameters, or module listings to confirm the websocket handler component is actively loaded and processing requests. Look for settings like 'websocket.enabled', 'ws.handler', or similar websocket-related configuration flags.
    Affected if The websocket handler module or feature is explicitly enabled in the application configuration
  3. Inspect websocket message processing configuration
    Review application logs and runtime configuration for websocket message handling settings. Check if there are limits on message size, rate, or connection duration defined. Look for any custom websocket message validators or filters.
    Affected if Websocket message handling lacks size limits, rate limiting, or message validation controls
  4. Check for DoS indicators in websocket logs
    Examine application logs, especially websocket-specific logs, for patterns indicating connection exhaustion, message flood attempts, or handler crashes. Look for error messages related to websocket handler failures.
    Affected if Logs show websocket handler instability, frequent crashes, or abnormal connection patterns from unauthenticated sources
  5. Confirm authentication status on websocket endpoints
    Review authentication and authorization configuration for websocket endpoints. Determine if the websocket handler permits unauthenticated connections or requires valid authentication tokens/sessions before accepting messages.
    Affected if Websocket endpoints allow connections without requiring authentication or valid session tokens

The environment is affected if the websocket handler is enabled, exposed to network access, and accepts unauthenticated connections without adequate rate limiting or message validation controls.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor-supplied patches when available. In the interim, consider implementing rate limiting on websocket endpoints and deploying a web application firewall (WAF) to filter potentially malicious websocket messages.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
19.0 hours of engineering $3,380
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,408.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-41707 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-41707 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data