Code InjectionWeakness · CWE-94

CVE-2025-41717

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-01-13
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
95/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An unauthenticated remote attacker can trick a high privileged user into uploading a malicious payload via the config-upload endpoint, leading to code injection as root. This results in a total loss of confidentiality, availability and integrity due to improper control of code generation ('Code Injection’).

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

This is a code injection vulnerability in the config-upload endpoint where an unauthenticated attacker can social-engineer a high-privileged user into uploading a malicious payload. The lack of proper validation on the uploaded file allows arbitrary code execution with root privileges, resulting in complete system compromise.

MitigationImplement strict validation and sanitization of uploaded files, enforce proper authentication/authorization on the config-upload endpoint, and ensure uploaded content cannot be executed as code (e.g., store files outside webroot, use non-executable storage, validate file magic bytes and types).

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Locate the config-upload endpoint
    Search application routing files (e.g., routes.js, urls.py, route.ts) for 'config-upload', 'upload', 'config' endpoint definitions. Also check web server configuration for any upload-related paths.
    Affected if The config-upload endpoint exists and is accessible without authentication
  2. Verify authentication is enforced on the config-upload endpoint
    Review the endpoint's security configuration, middleware, or access control list. Attempt a request to the endpoint without credentials (or check authentication middleware binding for that route).
    Affected if The endpoint does not require valid authentication or authorization for high-privileged users
  3. Inspect uploaded file validation logic
    Examine the code handling the config-upload endpoint for file type, extension, magic byte, or content validation. Look for functions that validate MIME type, file extension, or parse file contents before storage.
    Affected if No validation or weak validation (e.g., only checking file extension) is performed on uploaded files
  4. Check file storage configuration
    Review where uploaded files are stored. Verify if they are placed inside the webroot, retain executable permissions, or can be served as scripts.
    Affected if Uploaded files are stored in a web-accessible location with executable permissions or can be triggered via a URL
  5. Compare your installed version to affected releases
    Query the application's version (often via --version flag, API /version endpoint, or package.json/POM.xml). Compare against any official security advisories or release notes mentioning CVE-2025-41717.
    Affected if Your version is older than the patched release and matches the vulnerable range (if documented)

A user is affected if the config-upload endpoint exists, is accessible without proper authentication, lacks robust file validation, and stores uploads in an executable or web-accessible manner.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement strict validation and sanitization of uploaded files, enforce proper authentication/authorization on the config-upload endpoint, and ensure uploaded content cannot be executed as code (e.g., store files outside webroot, use non-executable storage, validate file magic bytes and types).

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-41717 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-41717 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data