Hard-coded CredentialsWeakness · CWE-798

CVE-2025-41722

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-10-22
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
The wsc server uses a hard-coded certificate to check the authenticity of SOAP messages. An unauthenticated remote attacker can extract private keys from the Software of the affected devices.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

The wsc server implements hard-coded certificates (including private keys) embedded in the device software for authenticating SOAP messages. An unauthenticated remote attacker can extract these embedded private keys from the firmware/software, enabling them to forge legitimate SOAP messages and potentially impersonate the device or access sensitive functions.

MitigationReplace hard-coded certificates with dynamically-generated or properly-managed certificate infrastructure, implement secure key storage, rotate any exposed credentials, and deploy firmware/software updates to affected devices.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if wsc server component is present
    Search for 'wsc' or 'wsc server' in installed software, running processes, or device firmware. Check for binaries named wsc, wscd, or related services.
    Affected if The wsc server component is found in the environment
  2. Extract and examine firmware for embedded certificates
    If firmware is available, use binwalk, strings, or firmware analysis tools to extract certificate files (.pem, .crt, .cer) and private key files (.key, .pem) from the firmware image.
    Affected if Certificate and private key files are found embedded in the firmware image
  3. Search for hard-coded private keys in software binary or config
    Use grep, strings, or hex search tools on binaries, libraries, or configuration files to search for PEM-encoded private key headers (-----BEGIN PRIVATE KEY-----, -----BEGIN RSA PRIVATE KEY-----) that may be embedded in the software code.
    Affected if Private keys are found embedded directly in binaries or configuration files
  4. Inspect wsc server configuration for certificate paths
    Examine wsc server configuration files, XML configs, or registry entries for references to hard-coded certificate paths or inline certificate data used for SOAP message authentication.
    Affected if Configuration points to embedded/static certificate files rather than dynamically-generated certificates
  5. Verify SOAP authentication mechanism
    Review wsc server logs, documentation, or network traffic to confirm that SOAP message authentication relies on the embedded certificates identified in previous steps.
    Affected if SOAP authentication uses the hard-coded certificates for message signing or device authentication

A user is affected if the wsc server component is present and uses hard-coded certificates with embedded private keys for SOAP message authentication.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Replace hard-coded certificates with dynamically-generated or properly-managed certificate infrastructure, implement secure key storage, rotate any exposed credentials, and deploy firmware/software updates to affected devices.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation8.0 h
  • Implementation24.0 h
  • Testing12.0 h
  • Review / QA6.0 h
50.0 hours of engineering $8,800
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $14,080.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-41722 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-41722 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data