Integer OverflowWeakness · CWE-190

CVE-2025-41726

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-01-27
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
94/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A low privileged remote attacker can execute arbitrary code by sending specially crafted calls to the web service of the Device Manager or locally via an API and can cause integer overflows which then may lead to arbitrary code execution within privileged processes.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Integer overflow vulnerability in Device Manager web service/API allows low-privileged remote attackers to send specially crafted calls that trigger integer overflows, leading to arbitrary code execution within privileged processes.

MitigationRestrict access to Device Manager web service/API to authorized personnel only; implement strict input validation on API parameters; apply vendor patches when available; consider network segmentation to limit exposure.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Device Manager web service presence
    Locate and list any running services or processes named 'Device Manager' or associated with device management functionality. Use commands like 'tasklist' on Windows or 'ps aux' on Linux, and review installed applications.
    Affected if The Device Manager web service or API is running and exposed on the system.
  2. Determine Device Manager version
    Check the installed version of the Device Manager software. This may be available via the application's 'About' or 'Version' info, in installed program lists, or by querying the API endpoint if accessible (e.g., /api/version or /health endpoint).
    Affected if The installed version cannot be determined or is unknown, making it impossible to verify against patched versions.
  3. Verify web service API exposure
    Review network configuration to determine if the Device Manager API is accessible from network endpoints. Check firewall rules, reverse proxy configurations, and listen addresses in the service configuration.
    Affected if The Device Manager API is exposed to network access without proper network segmentation or authentication layers.
  4. Review API authentication configuration
    Examine the Device Manager web service configuration files and authentication settings. Look for configurations controlling API access, privilege levels, and whether low-privileged accounts can send API requests.
    Affected if Low-privileged or unauthenticated accounts can send requests to the Device Manager API endpoints.
  5. Check for integer overflow indicators in logs
    Review application and system logs for any error messages related to integer overflow, buffer issues, or unexpected crashes in the Device Manager service. Search for keywords like 'overflow', 'integer', 'arithmetic error', or unexpected 'code execution' warnings.
    Affected if Logs contain integer overflow errors or unexpected behavior when processing API requests.

Your environment is likely affected if the Device Manager web service/API is running, exposed to network, accepts requests from low-privileged users, and the version cannot be confirmed as patched.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Restrict access to Device Manager web service/API to authorized personnel only; implement strict input validation on API parameters; apply vendor patches when available; consider network segmentation to limit exposure.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
30.0 hours of engineering $5,280
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,448.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-41726 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-41726 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data