Out-of-bounds ReadWeakness · CWE-125

CVE-2025-41739

MEDIUM · 5.9 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-12-01
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
68/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An unauthenticated remote attacker, who beats a race condition, can exploit a flaw in the communication servers of the CODESYS Control runtime system on Linux and QNX to trigger an out-of-bounds read via crafted socket communication, potentially causing a denial of service.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

An unauthenticated remote attacker who wins a race condition can exploit a flaw in the CODESYS Control runtime communication servers on Linux and QNX to trigger an out-of-bounds read via crafted socket communication, potentially causing denial of service.

MitigationApply vendor patches for CODESYS Control when available; consider network segmentation to limit exposure to untrusted networks since the attack is remotely exploitable without authentication.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
High
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm CODESYS Control installation
    Identify if CODESYS Control runtime is installed on the system. Look for CODESYS processes, services, or installation directories. On Linux, check for processes named 'CODESYSControl' or similar CODESYS-related processes.
    Affected if CODESYS Control runtime is not installed on the system
  2. Verify the operating system platform
    Confirm the system is running Linux or QNX, as these are the only platforms affected by this vulnerability. Check the OS using commands like 'uname -a' or 'cat /etc/os-release'.
    Affected if The system is running Linux or QNX with CODESYS Control installed
  3. Check if runtime communication server is enabled
    Determine if the CODESYS Control runtime communication server is active and listening on network ports. Look for open ports associated with CODESYS (commonly ports 11740, 11741, or similar). Use 'netstat -tulpn' or 'ss -tulpn' to list listening services.
    Affected if The CODESYS communication server is running and exposed on the network
  4. Compare installed version to affected ranges
    Locate the installed CODESYS Control version number. Check installation directories, runtime configuration files, or use any available version inspection tools provided by CODESYS. Compare this version against any vendor-published affected version lists.
    Affected if The installed version falls within an affected version range published by the vendor
  5. Assess network exposure
    Evaluate whether the CODESYS Control runtime is accessible from untrusted networks. Review firewall rules, network segmentation, and access control lists to determine if the communication server port is exposed to the internet or untrusted segments.
    Affected if The communication server port is accessible from untrusted or external networks without proper network filtering

A user is affected if CODESYS Control runtime for Linux or QNX is installed, the communication server is enabled and exposed, and the installed version matches an affected version range.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor patches for CODESYS Control when available; consider network segmentation to limit exposure to untrusted networks since the attack is remotely exploitable without authentication.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
20.0 hours of engineering $3,500
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-41739 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-41739 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data