CVE-2025-4199
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Abundatrade Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.8.02. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'abundatrade' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Abundatrade Plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in all versions up to 1.8.02 due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'abundatrade' admin page. This allows unauthenticated attackers to forge administrative requests that can modify plugin settings and inject malicious web scripts, provided they can trick a site administrator into clicking a malicious link.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Abundatrade plugin is installedLog into WordPress admin dashboard and navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins. Look for 'Abundatrade' in the list of active plugins.Affected if The plugin appears in the installed plugins list, indicating it is present in the environment.
-
Determine installed versionIn the Plugins list, find Abundatrade and note the version number displayed beneath the plugin name. Compare this to the affected range: versions up to and including 1.8.02.Affected if The installed version is 1.8.02 or lower, placing it within the vulnerable version range.
-
Confirm admin page accessibilityIn the WordPress admin, look for a menu item or page labeled 'abundatrade' under the Plugins or Settings menu. Attempt to access this page directly via /wp-admin/admin.php?page=abundatrade or similar URL pattern.Affected if The 'abundatrade' admin page exists and loads, indicating the vulnerable endpoint is present.
-
Review plugin settings for unauthorized changesAccess the Abundatrade plugin settings page and inspect all configuration fields. Check for any unexpected or suspicious values, particularly in fields that accept URLs, scripts, or external references.Affected if Settings contain unexpected values, suspicious URLs, or injected script content that was not intentionally configured by the administrator.
A user is affected if the Abundatrade plugin is installed with version 1.8.02 or lower, the admin page is accessible, and the plugin settings show any modifications not made by trusted administrators.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate to the latest patched version of the Abundatrade Plugin when available, or remove the plugin if no update is planned. As a temporary measure, educate administrators about not clicking untrusted links.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,424.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-4199 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-4199 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data