CVE-2025-4272
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA vulnerability was found in Mechrevo Control Console 1.0.2.70. It has been rated as critical. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality in the library C:\Program Files\OEM\MECHREVO Control Center\UniwillService\MyControlCenter\csCAPI.dll of the component GCUService. The manipulation leads to uncontrolled search path. An attack has to be approached locally. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitation is known to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA DLL hijacking vulnerability exists in Mechrevo Control Console 1.0.2.70 where the csCAPI.dll library in the GCUService component loads DLLs from an uncontrolled search path. A local attacker can place a malicious DLL in a location where the application will load it, achieving code execution with the application's privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify if Mechrevo Control Console is installedCheck for the presence of the application in the system: Look for the directory C:\Program Files\OEM\MECHREVO Control Center\ or C:\Program Files (x86)\OEM\MECHREVO Control Center\. You can also check the Windows Registry under HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall for an entry named 'Mechrevo Control Console' or similar.Affected if The application directory does not exist or the product is not found in the registry.
-
Determine the installed versionLocate the main executable (commonly ControlCenter.exe or similar) in the application directory. Right-click the executable, select Properties, and check the 'File version' or 'Product version' field in the Details tab. Alternatively, query the registry key that contains the version information from the uninstall entry found in the previous step.Affected if The installed version matches 1.0.2.70 exactly.
-
Locate the vulnerable GCUService component and csCAPI.dllNavigate to the application installation directory and look for a subdirectory named GCUService. Within that directory, verify the presence of csCAPI.dll. The typical path is C:\Program Files\OEM\MECHREVO Control Center\GCUService\csCAPI.dll.Affected if The GCUService folder and csCAPI.dll file exist in the expected location.
-
Check write permissions on the application directoryRight-click the application directory (C:\Program Files\OEM\MECHREVO Control Center\) and select Properties. Go to the Security tab, click Advanced. Review the permissions for Users or low-privilege groups. Check if any principal has 'Write' or 'Create Files' permissions, especially for Users or Everyone.Affected if Low-privilege users (such as standard Users group or authenticated users) have Write, Create Files, or Create Folders permissions on the application directory or its subdirectories.
-
Inspect for unauthorized DLLs in application pathsIn the GCUService folder and the main application directory, list all DLL files. Look for any unexpected or suspicious DLL files that do not belong to the legitimate application. Common malicious DLL names may mimic system DLLs or appear out of place. Use PowerShell: Get-ChildItem -Path 'C:\Program Files\OEM\MECHREVO Control Center\' -Filter *.dll | Select-Object Name, LastWriteTimeAffected if Unexpected DLL files are present in the application directory or GCUService subdirectory.
A user is affected if Mechrevo Control Console version 1.0.2.70 is installed with the GCUService component containing csCAPI.dll, and low-privilege users have write access to the application directory, allowing potential DLL hijacking.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUntil a vendor patch is available, ensure the application directory (C:\Program Files\OEM\MECHREVO Control Center\) and subdirectories are not writable by low-privilege users. Monitor for unauthorized DLL placement in these paths.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,152.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-4272 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-4272 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data