Path TraversalWeakness · CWE-22

CVE-2025-42946

MEDIUM · 6.9 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-08-12
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
71/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Due to directory traversal vulnerability in SAP S/4HANA (Bank Communication Management), an attacker with high privileges and access to a specific transaction and method in Bank Communication Management could gain unauthorized access to sensitive operating system files. This could allow the attacker to potentially read or delete these files hence causing a high impact on confidentiality and low impact on integrity. There is no impact on availability of the system.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Directory traversal vulnerability in SAP S/4HANA Bank Communication Management allows authenticated attackers with high privileges and access to specific transactions to traverse file system paths and gain unauthorized read/delete access to sensitive operating system files. This results in high confidentiality impact but low integrity impact with no availability impact.

MitigationApply SAP security patches for this vulnerability and review/restrict access to the affected Bank Communication Management transactions and methods to only necessary high-privilege users.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Adjacent
Complexity
Low
Privileges
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm SAP S/4HANA installation
    Execute transaction code SM37 or use SAP MII version checker to identify the SAP S/4HANA system version and confirm it is installed.
    Affected if The system is running SAP S/4HANA and the version falls within the affected range.
  2. Identify Bank Communication Management module
    Access SAP menu and navigate to Finance -> Bank Communication Management, or execute transaction code FQM to verify the BCM module is present and active in the system.
    Affected if The Bank Communication Management module is installed and enabled in the SAP S/4HANA environment.
  3. Verify access to BCM transactions
    Execute transaction codes associated with Bank Communication Management (such as FQ1, FQ2, or related BCM transaction codes) and verify whether the current user session can access these transaction entry points.
    Affected if The user has access to Bank Communication Management transactions in the SAP system.
  4. Check user privilege level
    Using transaction SU01 or SUIM, review the current user's profile and assigned roles to determine if high-privilege access (such as SAP_ALL, SAP_NEW, or administrative BCM roles) is granted.
    Affected if The authenticated user possesses high-privilege SAP roles or administrative access to BCM functions.
  5. Review file system access logs
    Examine SAP system traces (transaction ST03N), audit logs (transaction SM18/SM19), and operating system audit logs for any suspicious directory traversal patterns or unauthorized file read/delete operations targeting sensitive OS paths.
    Affected if Log entries indicate directory traversal attempts or unauthorized file access through BCM transactions.

A user is affected if they run SAP S/4HANA with Bank Communication Management enabled, have high-privilege access, and can execute the vulnerable BCM transactions that permit directory traversal to sensitive OS files.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply SAP security patches for this vulnerability and review/restrict access to the affected Bank Communication Management transactions and methods to only necessary high-privilege users.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-42946 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-42946 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data