CVE-2025-42953
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSAP Netweaver System Configuration does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user, resulting in escalation of privileges. This could completely compromise the integrity and availability with no impact on confidentiality of the system.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSAP Netweaver System Configuration contains an authorization bypass vulnerability where authenticated users can perform privileged actions without proper authorization checks, leading to privilege escalation. This allows authenticated attackers to compromise system integrity and availability while confidentiality remains unaffected.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify SAP NetWeaver versionUse transaction code SM51 to display the SAP NetWeaver release version, or check the kernel version via the SAP MMC or command 'disp+work -v' in the kernel directoryAffected if The installed version falls within the affected NetWeaver release range for CVE-2025-42953 (compare your version against known affected releases)
-
Locate System Configuration moduleAccess the SAP System Configuration via transaction code SA38 or directly navigate to the System Configuration node in SAP GUI (transaction code SCC4 for client configuration, SCC1 for transport between clients)Affected if The System Configuration module is active and accessible to authenticated users in your environment
-
Verify authorization role assignmentsUse transaction code PFCG to review role definitions, then transaction code SUIM to search for users assigned to privileged roles. Check if standard users have roles that grant System Configuration accessAffected if Standard authenticated users have roles that include System Configuration privileges without proper segregation of duties
-
Test authorization boundary for privileged actionsLog in as a non-privileged user and attempt to access System Configuration functions (e.g., changing system parameters via transaction code RZ10, modifying profile parameters, or accessing transport administration via SE01). Observe whether the system denies unauthorized accessAffected if Authenticated non-privileged users can execute System Configuration functions that should require elevated privileges
-
Review audit logs for privileged actionsUse transaction code SM37 or SAL to examine system logs and audit traces for System Configuration changes performed by standard users. Filter logs for transaction codes related to system configuration and parameter changesAffected if Audit logs show System Configuration changes made by users who should not have privileged access based on their assigned roles
You are affected if your SAP NetWeaver version contains the vulnerability AND the System Configuration module is accessible to authenticated users without proper authorization enforcement, allowing standard users to perform privileged actions.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement comprehensive authorization checks across all system configuration functions and enforce role-based access control (RBAC) to ensure users can only execute actions within their assigned privilege scope.
- Consultation12.0 h
- Implementation20.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $14,784.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-42953 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-42953 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data