Incorrect Privilege AssignmentWeakness · CWE-266

CVE-2025-42992

MEDIUM · 6.9 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-07-08
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
69/100
Remediation priority · Elevated

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
SAPCAR allows an attacker logged in with high privileges to create a malicious SAR archive in SAPCAR. This could enable the attacker to exploit critical files and directory permissions without breaking signature validation, resulting in potential privilege escalation. This has high impact on integrity, but low impact on confidentiality and availability of the system.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

SAPCAR (SAP Archive) contains a vulnerability where an attacker with high privileges can craft a malicious SAR archive that bypasses signature validation, allowing exploitation of critical files and directory permissions for privilege escalation while maintaining the archive's cryptographic integrity.

MitigationApply the relevant SAP security patch for SAPCAR when released; restrict high-privileged accounts and monitor for suspicious SAR archive creation activities.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
High
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
High
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm SAPCAR installation and version
    Run command 'SAPCAR -version' or check installation directory for SAPCAR executable. On Windows check Program Files, on Unix/Linux check /usr/sap or installation-specific paths.
    Affected if SAPCAR is installed and version falls within the affected range (compare your installed version to the vendor's published affected versions)
  2. Verify SAR archive processing capability
    Check if SAR archive extraction functionality is enabled. Look for SAR file associations or check SAPCAR usage logs in /usr/sap/trans/log (or equivalent) for recent archive operations.
    Affected if SAR archives can be processed and signature validation is performed by your SAPCAR installation
  3. Identify high-privileged accounts with access
    Review SAP system privileges assigned to accounts. Check SAP transaction SUIM (User Information) for users with SAP_ALL or critical SAPCAR-related authorizations.
    Affected if High-privileged accounts (SAP_ALL, SAP_ADMIN, or equivalent) exist in the environment with SAR archive processing capabilities
  4. Audit recent SAR archive operations
    Review system logs, SAP transport logs, and file system audit logs for SAR archive creation or extraction activities. Check /usr/sap/trans/cofiles and /usr/sap/trans/data for suspicious SAR files.
    Affected if Recent SAR archive operations exist, especially those involving critical system files or directory structures
  5. Inspect signature validation behavior
    Test SAPCAR signature validation with a test SAR archive if available, or review SAPCAR security logs for signature verification results.
    Affected if Signature validation can be bypassed or produces unexpected results for crafted archives

Your environment is affected if SAPCAR is installed with a vulnerable version and high-privileged users can process SAR archives in your environment.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the relevant SAP security patch for SAPCAR when released; restrict high-privileged accounts and monitor for suspicious SAR archive creation activities.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-42992 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-42992 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data