Improper Access ControlWeakness · CWE-284

CVE-2025-43027

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-10-30
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A critical severity vulnerability has been identified in the ALPR Manager role of Security Center that could allow attackers to gain administrative access to the Genetec Security Center system. The Genetec engineering team discovered this issue internally. There is currently no evidence that this vulnerability has been exploited in the wild.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A critical vulnerability (CVSS 9.8) in the ALPR Manager role of Genetec Security Center allows attackers to gain administrative access to the system. The issue was discovered internally by Genetec engineering with no known exploitation in the wild.

MitigationApply the vendor patch from Genetec once available; in the meantime, restrict network access to the Security Center ALPR Manager interface and monitor for suspicious administrative account activity.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Genetec Security Center installation
    Look for Genetec Security Center in installed programs (Windows: Programs and Features, Linux: dpkg -l | grep -i genetec) or check for Security Center related services running
    Affected if Genetec Security Center is present on the system
  2. Determine Security Center version
    Open Security Center Config Tool, go to About section, or check the version from the installation directory (typically C:\Program Files\Genetec\Security Center\Version.txt)
    Affected if Version matches or falls within an affected range (if vendor specifies one)
  3. Verify ALPR Manager role is enabled
    Open Security Center Config Tool, navigate to Roles > ALPR Manager, or use the administration interface to check if the ALPR role is configured and active
    Affected if ALPR Manager role is enabled and accessible
  4. Check for unauthorized administrative accounts
    In Security Center Config Tool, review Users and Roles > Administrators group for any unfamiliar accounts, or query the directory for accounts with Security Manager role added recently
    Affected if New or unknown accounts exist with administrative privileges
  5. Audit ALPR Manager role assignments
    Review which users are assigned to the ALPR Manager role via Config Tool > Roles > ALPR Manager > Members, and compare against expected personnel
    Affected if Unexpected users or service accounts have ALPR Manager role membership
  6. Review administrative activity logs
    Check Security Center audit logs (Security Desk or Config Tool > Audit Trail) for suspicious events such as privilege escalation, role changes, or admin access from unusual sources/IPs
    Affected if Log entries show unauthorized privilege escalation or admin access attempts

A system is affected if Genetec Security Center is installed with the ALPR Manager role enabled and evidence exists of unauthorized administrative access or unusual role assignments.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the vendor patch from Genetec once available; in the meantime, restrict network access to the Security Center ALPR Manager interface and monitor for suspicious administrative account activity.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-43027 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-43027 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data