CVE-2025-43738
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.132, and Liferay DXP 2025.Q2.0 through 2025.Q2.8, 2025.Q1.0 through 2025.Q1.15, 2024.Q4.0 through 2024.Q4.7, 2024.Q3.1 through 2024.Q3.13, 2024.Q2.1 through 2024.Q2.13 and 2024.Q1.1 through 2024.Q1.19 allows a remote authenticated user to inject JavaScript code via _com_liferay_expando_web_portlet_ExpandoPortlet_displayType parameter.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceReflected XSS vulnerability in Liferay Portal/DXP where the _com_liferay_expando_web_portlet_ExpandoPortlet_displayType parameter is not properly sanitized, allowing authenticated users to inject malicious JavaScript that gets reflected back in the HTTP response.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2024.q1.1, < 2024.q1.20>= 2024.Q2.1, <= 2024.Q2.13>= 2024.q3.1, <= 2024.q3.13>= 2024.q4.0, <= 2024.q4.7>= 2025.Q1.0, < 2025.Q1.16>= 2025.Q2.0, < 2025.Q2.9>= 7.4.0, <= 7.4.3.132CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Lifer installation and product typeLocate the Lifer Portal or DXP installation directory and confirm which product is in use. Check server startup logs or administration interface for product identification.Affected if Lifer Portal or DXP is installed and running
-
Determine installed Lifer versionAccess the Lifer administration panel (typically at /group/control_panel/manage), or check the portal-ext.properties file, or examine the OSGi bundle version in the Lifer Digital Enterprise Hub. The version is also visible in the footer of Lifer pages.Affected if Version falls within any of these ranges: DXP >= 2024.q1.1 to < 2024.q1.20; >= 2024.Q2.1 to <= 2024.Q2.13; >= 2024.q3.1 to <= 2024.q3.13; >= 2024.q4.0 to <= 2024.q4.7; >= 2025.Q1.0 to < 2025.Q1.16; >= 2025.Q2.0 to < 2025.Q2.9; or Portal 7.4.0 to 7.4.3.132
-
Confirm user authentication is enabledVerify that Lifer's user authentication system is active. Check if the login portlet is accessible and users can log in to the portal.Affected if User authentication is enabled (required for authenticated XSS attack)
-
Verify ExpandoPortlet module is accessibleAttempt to access the ExpandoPortlet interface by navigating to a portlet that uses the Expando service, or check the OSGi console for the expando.web.portlet.ExpandoPortlet bundle being active.Affected if ExpandoPortlet module is deployed and accessible to authenticated users
If Lifer Portal or DXP is running a version within the affected ranges listed and authenticated users can access the ExpandoPortlet, the environment is vulnerable to reflected XSS via the displayType parameter.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2024.q1.202025.Q1.162025.Q2.9
Apply vendor-provided security patches for the affected LPortal/DXP versions; until patched, implement WAF rules to filter or block malicious payloads in the displayType parameter.
Lifer Portal 7.4.3.133+ or DXP 2024.Q1.20+/2024.Q2.14+/2024.Q3.14+/2024.Q4.8+/2025.Q1.16+/2025.Q2.9+ (select the next quarterly release in your train)
- 1. Identify the exact currently deployed Lifter version (Portal or DXP) using the server's version information or admin console.
- 2. For Lifer Portal 7.4.x users: Upgrade to Lifer Portal 7.4.3.133 or later, which contains the fix for this XSS vulnerability.
- 3. For Lifer DXP users: Upgrade to the first fixed release in your quarterly cycle: 2024.Q1.20, 2024.Q2.14, 2024.Q3.14, 2024.Q4.8, 2025.Q1.16, or 2025.Q2.9 (depending on your release train).
- 4. After upgrading, verify the _com_liferay_expando_web_portlet_ExpandoPortlet_displayType parameter is properly encoded/escaped in responses.
- 5. Test the ExpandoPortlet functionality to ensure the upgrade did not break legitimate custom field operations.
- 6. Review Lifer's official security bulletin (lifera.dev) for any additional required post-upgrade configuration.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-43738 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-43738 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data