CVE-2025-43748
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedInsufficient CSRF protection for omni-administrator users in Liferay Portal 7.0.0 through 7.4.3.119, and Liferay DXP 2024.Q1.1 through 2024.Q1.6, 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.9, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.9, 7.4 GA through update 92, 7.3 GA through update 36, and older unsupported versions allows attackers to execute Cross-Site Request Forgery
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceLifera Portal and DXP have insufficient CSRF protection for omni-administrator users, allowing attackers to craft malicious requests that an authenticated administrator unknowingly executes. The vulnerability stems from missing or inadequate anti-CSRF token validation on administrative actions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 7.0, <= 7.4>= 2023.Q3.1, <= 2023.Q3.9>= 2023.Q4.0, <= 2023.Q4.9>= 2024.Q1.1, < 2024.Q1.7>= 7.0.0, < 7.4.3.120= 6.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Liferay Portal/DXP versionLog in as an administrator and navigate to Control Panel > Configuration > Server Administration > General, or check the portal-version property in portal.properties or portal-ext.propertiesAffected if The installed version falls within these ranges: DXP 7.0-7.4, 2023.Q3.1-2023.Q3.9, 2023.Q4.0-2023.Q4.9, 2024.Q1.1-2024.Q1.6; or Portal 7.0.0-7.4.3.119, or Portal 6.2
-
Verify CSRF token configuration in portal.propertiesOpen portal-ext.properties or portal.properties and search for properties related to CSRF protection such as 'csrf.token.enabled' or 'auth.token.enabled'Affected if The CSRF token validation is disabled, missing, or set to false for administrative actions
-
Check for anti-CSRF token presence in admin formsLog in as an administrator, open browser developer tools, inspect the Network tab, and submit an admin action (e.g., adding a user or modifying settings). Examine the request headers and form parameters for a CSRF token parameterAffected if No anti-CSRF token parameter (such as 'p_auth', 'csrfToken', or similar) is present in admin action requests
-
Verify Origin and Referer header validationCheck the web.xml or portal's security configuration for CSRF filter settings that validate Origin and Referer headers on sensitive admin endpointsAffected if Origin and Referer header validation is not configured or is disabled for admin operations
-
Confirm omni-administrator access is enabledNavigate to Control Panel > Users and Roles > Users and verify that omni-administrator accounts exist or that the portal allows multiple admin sessionsAffected if Omni-administrator functionality is in use, as the vulnerability specifically affects omni-administrator users
You are affected if your Liferay Portal or DXP version is within the affected ranges AND admin actions lack proper anti-CSRF token validation or header checks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.4.3.1202024.Q1.7
Apply the vendor-provided security update/patch for this vulnerability. As an immediate defensive measure, configure the application to validate Origin and Referer headers on sensitive admin operations.
LiferL Portal 7.4.3.120+ or DXP 2024.Q1.7+ (depending on product)
- 1. Identify the currently installed Liferay Portal or DXP version by checking the portal-ext.properties or the control panel About section
- 2. For LiferL Portal 7.0-7.4.3.119: Upgrade to LiferL Portal 7.4.3.120 or later
- 3. For DXP 2024.Q1.1-2024.Q1.6: Upgrade to DXP 2024.Q1.7 or later
- 4. For DXP 2023.Q4.0-2023.Q4.9: Upgrade to DXP 2024.Q1.7 or later (DXP 2023.Q4.x is no longer supported per LiferL's support matrix)
- 5. For DXP 2023.Q3.1-2023.Q3.9: Upgrade to DXP 2024.Q1.7 or later
- 6. For DXP 7.4 GA (older than update 92): Upgrade to DXP 7.4 update 92 or later, or migrate to 7.4.3.120
- 7. For DXP 7.3 GA (older than update 36): Upgrade to DXP 7.3 update 36 or later, or migrate to a supported version
- 8. After upgrade, verify the CSRF protection is functioning by testing admin actions
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,936.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-43748 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-43748 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data