CVE-2025-43758
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedLiferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.132, and Liferay DXP 2025.Q1.0 through 2025.Q1.5, 2024.Q4.0 through 2024.Q4.7, 2024.Q3.1 through 2024.Q3.13, 2024.Q2.0 through 2024.Q2.13, 2024.Q1.1 through 2024.Q1.15 and 7.4 GA through update 92 allows unauthenticated users (guests) to access via URL files uploaded by object entry and stored in document_library
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceLifera Portal and DXP contain an access control bypass where guest/unauthenticated users can directly access files stored in document_library that were uploaded via object entries. This allows unauthorized download of files that should require authenticated access.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2024.Q1.1, < 2024.Q1.16>= 2024.q2.0, <= 2024.q2.13>= 2024.q3.1, <= 2024.q3.13>= 2024.q4.0, <= 2024.q4.7>= 2025.Q1.0, < 2025.Q1.6= 7.4>= 7.4.0, <= 7.4.3.132CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Lifer Portal/DXP versionCheck the Lifer version by reviewing the Lifer JAR files in the bundle or accessing the Control Panel > Configuration > Server Information in the Lifer UI. Alternatively, check portal-ext.properties or portal-setup-wizard.properties for the version string.Affected if The installed version falls within any of the following ranges: >= 2024.Q1.1 and < 2024.Q1.16; >= 2024.q2.0 and <= 2024.q2.13; >= 2024.q3.1 and <= 2024.q3.13; >= 2024.q4.0 and <= 2024.q4.7; >= 2025.Q1.0 and < 2025.Q1.6; = 7.4 (DXP); or >= 7.4.0 and <= 7.4.3.132 (Portal)
-
Verify Objects module with file upload fields is in useAccess the Lifer Control Panel > Object Definitions and review custom object definitions. Check if any object definitions include a file field type (typically named 'file' or similar) that stores attachments.Affected if Custom object entries with file upload fields exist and have been used to upload documents to the document_library.
-
Test unauthenticated file access via document_libraryAs an unauthenticated (guest) user, attempt to access a file URL that was uploaded through an object entry. The URL typically follows the pattern: /documents/[site-id]/[folder-id]/[file-name] or /c/document_library/get?fileName=[filename]. Use a browser incognito window or curl without authentication headers.Affected if The file downloads successfully without requiring login credentials, indicating the access control bypass is present.
-
Check for recent authentication-required file downloadsReview server access logs for document_library GET requests. Determine if requests to files uploaded via object entries originate from unauthenticated IP addresses (no session token or LIFERAY_SESSION cookie).Affected if Logs show successful GET requests to object-uploaded files from unauthenticated sources.
If the installed Lifer version is within the affected ranges AND files uploaded through object entries are accessible to unauthenticated users, the environment is vulnerable to CVE-2025-43758.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2024.Q1.162025.Q1.6
Apply the vendor-released patches for the affected versions (7.4.3.132+ or the DXP updates) and verify that unauthenticated access to document_library files is no longer possible.
Lifera DXP: upgrade to 2024.Q1.16, 2024.Q2.14, 2024.Q3.14, or 2024.Q4.8 (depending on your release train); Lifer Portal: upgrade to 7.4.3.133 or later
- 1. Identify the currently deployed Lifford DXP or Portal version from the admin console or system properties.
- 2. Based on the identified version, determine the minimum target fixed version: For DXP 2024.Q1.x, upgrade to 2024.Q1.16 or later; for DXP 2024.Q2.x, upgrade to 2024.Q2.14 or later; for DXP 2024.Q3.x, upgrade to 2024.Q3.14 or later; for DXP 2024.Q4.x, upgrade to 2024.Q4.8 or later; for Liferay Portal 7.4.x, upgrade to 7.4.3.133 or later.
- 3. Before upgrading in production, test the new version in a staging environment to verify compatibility with existing customizations and plugins.
- 4. Perform a full backup of the database and LIFERAY_HOME directory.
- 5. Deploy the upgraded version following the standard Lifer upgrade process.
- 6. After upgrade, verify that unauthenticated users can no longer access files in document_library that were uploaded via object entries.
- 7. Review other security settings and consider implementing additional access controls on document_library folders.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,168.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-43758 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-43758 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data