CVE-2025-4376
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Input Validation vulnerability in Sparx Systems Pro Cloud Server's WebEA model search field allows Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). This issue affects Pro Cloud Server: earlier than 6.0.165.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSparx Systems Pro Cloud Server's WebEA component contains an improper input validation vulnerability in the model search field that allows attackers to inject malicious JavaScript code (XSS). Users who view search results containing the injected payload will have the script executed in their browser context.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- P
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Pro Cloud Server installation locationLocate the Pro Cloud Server installation directory, typically in C:\Program Files\Sparx Systems\Pro Cloud Server on Windows or /opt/sparxsystems/pro_cloud_server on LinuxAffected if Pro Cloud Server is installed and running
-
Determine Pro Cloud Server versionCheck the server version by inspecting the About section in the Pro Cloud Server administration interface, or check the version info in the installation directory (often in a version.txt, about dialog, or in the binary properties)Affected if The installed version is lower than 6.0.165 (vulnerable versions are prior to the 6.0.165 patch release)
-
Confirm WebEA component is enabledAccess the Pro Cloud Server configuration or administration panel and verify that WebEA (Web Enterprise Architecture) module is enabled and accessibleAffected if WebEA is enabled and publicly or internally accessible
-
Verify model search feature is accessibleLog into WebEA and navigate to the model search functionality to confirm it is available as an entry point for the XSS vulnerabilityAffected if The model search field is accessible to users (authenticated or anonymous)
You are affected if Pro Cloud Server version is below 6.0.165 AND WebEA with the model search feature is enabled and accessible to users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Pro Cloud Server to version 6.0.165 or later to obtain the patched version. As a temporary mitigation, restrict access to WebEA until the upgrade can be applied.
Pro Cloud Server 6.0.165 or later
- Obtain Pro Cloud Server version 6.0.165 or later from the official Sparx Systems download repository
- Follow the standard Pro Cloud Server upgrade procedure as documented in the Sparx Systems installation guide
- Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the Pro Cloud Server version
- Confirm the WebEA model search field no longer permits XSS by testing with benign input
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,808.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-4376 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-4376 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data