CVE-2025-43765
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA Stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in the Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.131, and Liferay DXP 2024.Q4.0, 2024.Q3.1 through 2024.Q3.13, 2024.Q2.0 through 2024.Q2.13, 2024.Q1.1 through 2024.Q1.13 and 7.4 GA through update 92 allows an remote non-authenticated attacker to inject JavaScript into the text field from a web content.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Lifer Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.131 and Lifer DXP multiple versions allows unauthenticated remote attackers to inject malicious JavaScript into text fields within web content. The injected payload persists in the database and executes when other users view the affected web content.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2024.Q1.1, < 2024.Q1.14>= 2024.q2.0, <= 2024.q2.13>= 2024.q3.1, <= 2024.q3.13= 7.4= 2024.q4.0>= 7.4.0, < 7.4.3.132CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Lifer Portal versionLog into the Lifer Portal Control Panel, navigate to Configuration > System Information > Platform, and note the version number. Alternatively, locate the portal-impl.jar in the application server and check the portal.version property in portal-impl.jar/com/lifer/portal/impl/build.properties.Affected if The installed version is >= 7.4.0 and < 7.4.3.132
-
Check Lifer DXP versionLog into the Lifer DXP Control Panel, navigate to Configuration > System Information > Platform, and note the version number. Check if it matches the affected DXP ranges: 2024.Q1.1 through 2024.Q1.13, 2024.q2.0 through 2024.q2.13, 2024.q3.1 through 2024.q3.13, 7.4, or 2024.q4.0.Affected if The installed version matches any of the affected DXP version ranges provided in the CVE (2024.Q1.x, 2024.q2.x, 2024.q3.x, 7.4, or 2024.q4.0)
-
Verify if Web Content feature is in useNavigate to Lifer Portal/DXP Control Panel > Content & Data > Web Content and inspect whether any web content articles exist. The vulnerability affects text fields within web content, so this feature must be actively used for exploitation.Affected if Web Content articles exist in the system and users can create or edit web content text fields
You are affected if your Lifer Portal version is 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.131 (or your DXP version matches any of the 2024.Q1-Q4/7.4 affected ranges) AND the Web Content feature is being used, allowing stored XSS payloads to persist in web content text fields.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.4.3.1322024.Q1.14
Apply the vendor-supplied patches for the affected Lifer Portal/DXP versions and implement output encoding/sanitization for web content text fields. Consider implementing Content Security Policy (CSP) headers as a defense-in-depth measure.
Lifteray Portal: 7.4.3.132+ | DXP 2024.Q1: 2024.Q1.14+ | DXP 2024.Q2: 2024.Q2.14+ | DXP 2024.Q3: 2024.Q3.14+
- 1. Identify the exact Lifteray product and version running (Portal or DXP, and the specific version number)
- 2. For Liferay Portal 7.4.x users: Upgrade to version 7.4.3.132 or later
- 3. For Liferay DXP 2024.Q1.x users: Upgrade to version 2024.Q1.14 or later
- 4. For Liferay DXP 2024.Q2.x users: Upgrade to version 2024.Q2.14 or later
- 5. For Liferay DXP 2024.Q3.x users: Upgrade to version 2024.Q3.14 or later
- 6. After upgrading, verify the XSS vulnerability is resolved by testing web content text field input validation
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-43765 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-43765 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data