CVE-2025-43783
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedReflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Liferay Portal 7.4.3.73 through 7.4.3.128, and Liferay DXP 2024.Q3.0 through 2024.Q3.1, 2024.Q2.0 through 2024.Q2.13, 2024.Q1.1 through 2024.Q1.12, 7.4 update 73 through update 92 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the /c/portal/comment/discussion/get_editor path.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in Luffy Portal and DXP where user-supplied input via the /c/portal/comment/discussion/get_editor endpoint is not properly sanitized before being rendered in the response, allowing attackers to inject arbitrary HTML or JavaScript that executes in the victim's browser.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2024.Q1.1, < 2024.Q1.13>= 2024.q2.0, <= 2024.q2.13>= 2024.Q3.0, < 2024.Q3.2= 7.4>= 7.4.0, < 7.4.3.129CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine the installed Liferay versionAccess the Liferay Control Panel and navigate to Configuration > Server Administration > Product Information, or check the portal-ext.properties file for the version property. Compare the displayed version number against the affected ranges: 7.4.0 to 7.4.3.128 for Portal, or the DXP ranges 2024.Q1.1 to 2024.Q1.12, 2024.Q2.0 to 2024.Q2.13, 2024.Q3.0 to 2024.Q3.1, and 7.4.Affected if The installed version falls within any of the listed affected version ranges.
-
Verify if comment or discussion feature is enabledIn the Liferay Control Panel, navigate to Content & Data > Comments or check the portal-ext.properties for the following properties: comments.enabled, discussion.enabled, or similar configuration flags that enable the commenting system.Affected if The comment or discussion feature is enabled in the portal configuration.
-
Confirm the vulnerable endpoint is accessibleAttempt to access the URL path /c/portal/commit/discussion/get_editor on the server using a web browser or curl command. This endpoint handles comment editor loading.Affected if The endpoint responds with content rather than a 404 or access denied error, indicating the endpoint exists and is reachable.
A user is affected if they are running a Liferay Portal version between 7.4.0 and 7.4.3.128 inclusive, or a DXP version in the 2024.Q1, Q2, or Q3 ranges listed, AND the comment/discussion feature is enabled, making the /c/portal/comment/discussion/get_editor endpoint accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.4.3.1292024.Q1.132024.Q3.2
Upgrade to a patched Luffy version beyond 7.4.3.128 for Portal or the latest available DXP update. Alternatively, implement output encoding and input validation on the affected endpoint.
Liferay Portal 7.4.3.129 or later; DXP 2024.Q3.2, 2024.Q2.14, or 2024.Q1.13 or later depending on your release line
- 1. Identify the current Lifter Portal or DXP version by checking the Liferay Control Panel or the portal-ext.properties file
- 2. For Liferay Portal 7.4.x: upgrade to version 7.4.3.129 or later
- 3. For Liferay DXP 2024.Q1.x: upgrade to version 2024.Q1.13 or later
- 4. For Liferay DXP 2024.Q2.x: upgrade to version 2024.Q2.14 or later (the first version after the affected range)
- 5. For Liferay DXP 2024.Q3.x: upgrade to version 2024.Q3.2 or later
- 6. Verify the upgrade by accessing the /c/portal/comment/discussion/get_editor endpoint and confirming the XSS vulnerability is no longer exploitable
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-43783 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-43783 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data