CVE-2025-43787
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA Stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in the Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.132, and Liferay DXP 2025.Q3.0, 2025.Q2.0 through 2025.Q2.12, 2025.Q1.0 through 2025.Q1.17, 2024.Q4.0 through 2024.Q4.7, 2024.Q3.0 through 2024.Q3.13, 2024.Q2.0 through 2024.Q2.13 and 2024.Q1.1 through 2024.Q1.20 allows an remote authenticated attacker to inject JavaScript through the organization site names. The malicious payload is stored and executed without proper sanitization or escaping.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceStored XSS vulnerability in Liferay Portal and DXP allows authenticated attackers to inject malicious JavaScript through organization site names. The payload is persisted in the database and executed without sanitization or escaping when other users view the affected content.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2024.q1.1, < 2024.q1.21>= 2024.q2.0, <= 2024.q2.13>= 2024.Q3.0, <= 2024.Q3.13>= 2024.q4.0, <= 2024.q4.7>= 2025.Q1.0, <= 2025.Q1.17>= 2025.q2.0, <= 2025.q2.12= 2025.q3.0>= 7.4.0, <= 7.4.3.132CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Liferay versionAccess the Liferay Control Panel > Server Management > Server Information, or inspect the portal.properties file in the deployment, or check the WAR file version metadata. Liferet versions follow formats like 7.4.x.x or 2024.qX.X.Affected if The installed version falls within any of these ranges: 7.4.0 to 7.4.3.132; 2024.q1.1 to 2024.q1.21; 2024.q2.0 to 2024.q2.13; 2024.Q3.0 to 2024.Q3.13; 2024.q4.0 to 2024.q4.7; 2025.Q1.0 to 2025.Q1.17; 2025.q2.0 to 2025.q2.12; or exactly 2025.q3.0
-
Verify organizations with site functionality are in useNavigate to Control Panel > Users > Organizations. Review whether any organizations exist and whether the 'Site' option is enabled for those organizations (organization site creation is an optional feature).Affected if Organizations exist and at least one organization has an associated site enabled
-
Inspect organization site names for potential XSS payloadsIn the Control Panel, examine each organization's details and site configuration. Specifically review the Site Name field. Alternatively, query the LayoutSet or Group table in the Liferet database for organization site entries and inspect the name field for HTML/script tags.Affected if Any organization site name contains unsanitized HTML, script tags, or JavaScript event handlers (for example, <script>, onclick=, onerror=, or javascript: URIs)
-
Confirm the XSS is stored and executes without sanitizationCreate a test organization with a site name containing a benign payload such as <img src=x onerror=alert(1)>. Save it and then view the organization in a different browser session or by a different user to observe if the script executes.Affected if The payload renders as raw HTML/JavaScript rather than being escaped or neutralized when viewed by other users
You are affected if your Liferet Portal/DXP version matches the affected ranges AND organizations with sites are configured AND their site names contain unsanitized script content that executes when viewed.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2024.q1.21
Apply the vendor patch or upgrade to a fixed Liferay version; implement input validation on organization site name fields and consider Content Security Policy headers as defense-in-depth.
Upgrade to the next minor release within your product line: Portal 7.4.3.133+, DXP 2024.Q1.21+, DXP 2024.Q2.14+, DXP 2024.Q3.14+, or DXP 2024.Q4.8+
- 1. Identify the exact Lifer product and version currently deployed (Portal or Digital Experience Platform, and the specific q-release version)
- 2. For Lifer Portal 7.4.0-7.4.3.132: upgrade to version 7.4.3.133 or later
- 3. For DXP 2024.Q1.1-2024.Q1.20: upgrade to 2024.Q1.21 or later
- 4. For DXP 2024.Q2.0-2024.Q2.13: upgrade to 2024.Q2.14 or later
- 5. For DXP 2024.Q3.0-2024.Q3.13: upgrade to 2024.Q3.14 or later
- 6. For DXP 2024.Q4.0-2024.Q4.7: upgrade to 2024.Q4.8 or later
- 7. After upgrade, verify that organization site name input fields properly sanitize HTML/JavaScript content
- 8. Test that the stored XSS payload in organization site names no longer executes
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-43787 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-43787 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data