CVE-2025-43789
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedJSON Web Services in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.119, and Liferay DXP 2024.Q1.1 through 2024.Q1.9, 7.4 GA through update 92 published to OSGi are registered and invoked directly as classes which allows Service Access Policies get executed.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceJSON Web Services in Liferay Portal 7.4.0-7.4.3.119 and DXP 2024.Q1.1-2024.Q1.9 are registered and invoked directly as classes, which allows Service Access Policies to be executed. This class-based invocation bypasses intended security controls around the service layer.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2024.Q1.1, < 2024.Q1.10= 7.4>= 7.4.0, < 7.4.3.120CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed LiferPortal or DXP versionCheck the portal version in the LiferPortal admin console (Control Panel > Configuration > System Information) or examine the portal-impl.properties file in the installation. For DXP, check the digital experience platform version.Affected if Version is 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.119 for LiferPortal, or between 2024.Q1.1 and 2024.Q1.9 for DXP.
-
Verify JSON Web Services are exposedAttempt to access the JSON web services endpoint at /api/jsonws or check the JSON ws configuration in the Control Panel under API > JSON Web Services. Confirm that JSON WS endpoints are listed as available.Affected if JSON web service endpoints are accessible and registered in the system.
-
Inspect Service Access Policies configurationNavigate to Control Panel > Configuration > Service Access Policy (or equivalent in your version). Review the active policies to see which services are covered by access controls.Affected if Service Access Policies are defined but JSON web services may bypass these controls due to class-based invocation.
-
Check for class-based JSON WS invocation patternsReview the JSON web service registry or examine the /api/jsonws/invoke endpoint to see how services are registered. Look for direct class references rather than service-based invocation.Affected if JSON WS services are registered and invoked as direct Java classes rather than through the service layer.
Your environment is affected if you run LiferPortal 7.4.0-7.4.3.119 or DXP 2024.Q1.1-2024.Q1.9 AND have JSON web services exposed with Service Access Policies that may not be properly enforced.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.4.3.1202024.Q1.10
Upgrade Liferay Portal to 7.4.3.120+ or DXP to the patched version beyond 2024.Q1.9. Review and validate Service Access Policies to ensure they are properly enforced for affected JSON web service endpoints.
Lifford Portal 7.4.3.120 or later / Lifford DXP 2024.Q1.10 or later
- 1. Identify the exact Lifford Portal or DXP version currently running using the Control Panel or Gogo shell command.
- 2. For Lifford Portal 7.4.x users: Schedule an upgrade to version 7.4.3.120 or later.
- 3. For Lifford DXP 2024.Q1.x users: Schedule an upgrade to version 2024.Q1.10 or later.
- 4. Before upgrading, perform a full backup of the database and documents/media repository.
- 5. Review the Lifford upgrade documentation for your specific version path.
- 6. Execute the upgrade in a staging environment first to verify compatibility with custom plugins and themes.
- 7. After upgrading, verify that JSON Web Services now correctly enforce Service Access Policies.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-43789 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-43789 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data