CVE-2025-43792
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedRemote staging in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.105, and older unsupported versions, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.4, 7.4 GA through update 92, 7.3 GA through update 35, and older unsupported versions does not properly obtain the remote address of the live site from the database which, which allows remote authenticated users to exfiltrate data to an attacker controlled server (i.e., a fake “live site”) via the _com_liferay_exportimport_web_portlet_ExportImportPortlet_remoteAddress and _com_liferay_exportimport_web_portlet_ExportImportPortlet_remotePort parameters. To successfully exploit this vulnerability, an attacker must also successfully obtain the staging server’s shared secret and add the attacker controlled server to the staging server’s whitelist.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceLiferit's remote staging feature fails to properly retrieve and validate the remote address of the live site from the database. This allows an authenticated attacker who has obtained the staging server's shared secret to add an attacker-controlled server to the staging whitelist and exfiltrate data through the ExportImportPortlet using the remoteAddress and remotePort parameters.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 7.3>= 2023.q3.1, < 2023.q3.5= 7.3= 7.4= 2023.q4.0< 7.4.3.106CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Liferit portal versionAccess the Liferit Control Panel > Configuration > Server Administration > Overview, or inspect the portal-ext.properties file for the version property, or query the OSGi console for bundle version com.liferit.portalAffected if The installed version is Liferit Portal < 7.4.3.106, or Liferit DXP < 7.3, or any version from 2023.q3.1 to 2023.q3.4, or 2023.q4.0, or 7.3, or 7.4 (specific builds within these branches)
-
Verify remote staging is enabledNavigate to Liferit Control Panel > Configuration > Staging > Remote Staging, or inspect the database table StagingConfiguration for rows where remoteStagingEnabled = trueAffected if Remote staging is currently enabled on the system
-
Confirm ExportImportPortlet is accessibleAccess the ExportImportPortlet via the Liferit Control Panel at Ports > Export Import, or check the OSGi configuration for com.liferit.exportimport.portlet.ExportImportPortlet to verify it is registered and not disabledAffected if The ExportImportPortlet is active and accessible to authenticated users with staging permissions
-
Inspect staging server whitelistQuery the database table RemoteStagingGroupGroupRel or inspect the staging configuration JSON at Liferit Control Panel > Configuration > Staging > Remote Staging > Servers whitelistAffected if The whitelist contains servers that were not added by a trusted administrator, or contains any server with an unexpected remoteAddress or remotePort value
-
Verify staging shared secret configurationCheck the portal-ext.properties for the property staging.shared.secret, or inspect the encrypted value in the database table StagingConfiguration for the sharedSecret fieldAffected if A staging shared secret is configured and active (the attacker needs this secret to exploit the vulnerability)
A user is affected if they are running any of the listed vulnerable Liferit versions with remote staging enabled and the ExportImportPortlet accessible, combined with an active staging shared secret.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.37.4.3.1062023.q3.5
Upgrade to the patched Liferit version. Immediately rotate staging shared secrets, audit the staging server whitelist for unauthorized entries, and restrict access to staging configuration to trusted administrators only.
LPortal 7.4.3.106+ / DXP 7.4 Update 93+ / DXP 7.3 Update 36+ / DXP 2023.Q3.5+
- 1. Back up your current Liferay Portal/DXP database and configuration files before proceeding with any upgrade.
- 2. Identify your current LPortal/DXP version using the Control Panel > Server Administration > Summary.
- 3. For Liferay Portal 7.4.x users: Upgrade to LPortal 7.4.3.106 or later.
- 4. For Liferay DXP 7.4 users: Apply DXP 7.4 Update 93 or later (which includes the fix for 7.4.3.106).
- 5. For Lifer DXP 7.3 users: Apply DXP 7.3 Update 36 or later.
- 6. For Lifer DXP 2023.Q3.x users: Upgrade to DXP 2023.Q3.5 or later.
- 7. After upgrade, verify the Remote Staging configuration at: Control Panel > Publishing > Staging > Remote Staging.
- 8. Confirm the remote address is now properly obtained from the database configuration rather than user-supplied parameters.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-43792 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-43792 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data