CVE-2025-43811
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMultiple stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the related asset selector in Liferay Portal 7.4.3.50 through 7.4.3.111, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.4, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.7, and 7.4 update 50 through update 92 allows remote authenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted payload injected into an asset author’s (1) First Name, (2) Middle Name, or (3) Last Name text field.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceStored XSS vulnerability in Liferays related asset selector component allows authenticated users to inject malicious JavaScript/HTML through the First Name, Middle Name, or Last Name fields of an asset author. The unsanitized input is stored and executed when other users view the affected asset.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2023.Q3.1, < 2023.Q3.8>= 2023.Q4.0, < 2023.Q4.5= 7.4>= 7.4.3.50, < 7.4.3.112CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Liferays Portal versionNavigate to Control Panel > Configuration > Server Administration > Version, or check the portal-ext.properties file for the version property, or examine the WAR file version in the deploy directoryAffected if The installed version is >= 7.4.3.50 and < 7.4.3.112, or is 2023.Q3.x (>= 2023.Q3.1 and < 2023.Q3.8), or is 2023.Q4.x (>= 2023.Q4.0 and < 2023.Q4.5), or is exactly 7.4 (without specific patch level)
-
Verify related asset selector is in useSearch for portlets or widgets that utilize the asset selector functionality, typically found in Web Content, Blog, or Document and Media structures that reference author informationAffected if The related asset selector component is deployed and accessible to authenticated users in the environment
-
Inspect asset author name fields for existing XSSQuery the database tables storing asset-related data (such as AssetEntry, AssetAuthor, or related tables) for HTML or script tags in First Name, Middle Name, or Last Name fields; alternatively, create a test asset and examine the author name fields through the UI for unescaped charactersAffected if Any asset author names contain unescaped HTML tags like <script>, <img>, or javascript: URIs
-
Review user permissions for asset creationCheck Control Panel > Users and Permissions > Roles to see which authenticated roles have permissions to create or edit assets that use the related asset selectorAffected if Authenticated users have the ability to create or modify assets containing author name fields
Your environment is affected if the installed Liferays version falls within the vulnerable ranges AND the related asset selector component is in use, which could allow stored XSS in asset author name fields to execute for other users viewing those assets.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.4.3.1122023.Q3.82023.Q4.5
Apply proper input validation and output encoding to all asset author name fields in the related asset selector. Upgrade to Liferays patched versions where available.
Lifteray Portal 7.4.3.112+ / DXP 2023.Q3.8+ / DXP 2023.Q4.5+ / DXP 7.4 update 93+
- Identify your current Lifteray Portal or DXP version by checking the Control Panel > Configuration > Server Administration > Version
- For Lifteray Portal 7.4.x users: Upgrade to version 7.4.3.112 or later
- For Lifteray DXP 2023.Q3 users: Upgrade to version 2023.Q3.8 or later
- For Lifteray DXP 2023.Q4 users: Upgrade to version 2023.Q4.5 or later
- For Lifteray DXP 7.4 (updates): Ensure update 93 or later is applied
- After upgrade, verify the fix by testing the asset author fields (First Name, Middle Name, Last Name) in the related asset selector
- Validate that existing functionality continues to work as expected
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing5.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,752.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-43811 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-43811 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data