CVE-2025-43814
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.112, and older unsupported versions, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.8, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.10, 7.4 GA through update 92, and older unsupported versions the audit events records a user’s password reminder answer, which allows remote authenticated users to obtain a user’s password reminder answer via the audit events.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe audit logging system in Lifer Portal and DXP improperly records password reminder answers in audit event logs. This sensitive authentication recovery data is accessible to any authenticated user who can view audit events, enabling unauthorized disclosure of password reminder answers.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2023.Q3.1, <= 2023.Q3.10>= 2023.Q4.0, < 2023.Q4.9= 7.4>= 7.2.0, < 7.4.3.113CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Lifer Portal or DXP versionLocate the installed Lifer version via the control panel (Server > Information) or check the portal-ext.properties file for the version property. Compare against the affected ranges: DXP 2023.Q3.1 to 2023.Q3.10, 2023.Q4.0 to 2023.Q4.9, and 7.4; Portal 7.2.0 to 7.4.3.112Affected if The installed version falls within any of the listed affected version ranges
-
Confirm audit logging is enabledVerify the audit logging module is active by checking the Lifer control panel under Configuration > Audit, or inspect the portal-ext.properties for audit.framework.enabled=trueAffected if Audit logging is enabled and the version is vulnerable
-
Examine audit event logs for password reminder dataAccess the audit log viewer (typically at /audit//view or via the Events section in the control panel) and search for events containing fields related to password reminder answers, such as 'reminderQueryAnswer' or similar authentication recovery dataAffected if Audit logs contain password reminder answer fields in any recorded events
-
Verify user access to audit eventsCheck the roles and permissions assigned to users to determine which authenticated users can view audit events. Typically found under Roles > Permissions for the Audit portletAffected if Any authenticated users (beyond administrators) have permission to view audit event logs
If the Lifer version is within the affected ranges, audit logging is enabled, and users with audit view access exist, then password reminder answers may be exposed in the audit logs.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.4.3.1132023.Q4.9
Configure audit logging to exclude password reminder answer fields from being recorded, or apply vendor patches that prevent this sensitive data from being logged.
LPortal: 7.4.3.113+ | LXP: 2023.Q4.9+
- Identify the exact Liferay Portal or DXP version currently running using the Control Panel or server logs
- For LPortal 7.4.x: Upgrade to version 7.4.3.113 or later
- For LXP 2023.Q4.x: Upgrade to version 2023.Q4.9 or later
- For LXP 2023.Q3.x: Upgrade to a version beyond 2023.Q3.10 (such as 2023.Q4.9 or later)
- After upgrade, verify that audit events no longer contain password reminder answers by reviewing recent audit logs
- Ensure the upgrade is tested in a non-production environment first
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-43814 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-43814 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data