CVE-2025-43818
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Calendar widget in Liferay Portal 7.4.3.35 through 7.4.3.110, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.4, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.6, 7.4 update 35 through update 92, and 7.3 update 25 through update 36 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted payload injected into a Calendar's “Name” text field
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the Calendar widget of Liferay Portal and DXP. Attackers can inject malicious JavaScript or HTML into the Calendar's 'Name' field, which then executes when other users view or interact with the calendar entry.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2023.Q3.1, < 2023.Q3.7>= 2023.Q4.0, < 2023.Q4.5= 7.3= 7.4>= 7.4.3.35, < 7.4.3.111CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify L Portal/DXP versionAccess the L Control Panel > Configuration > Server Information, or check the osgi/state/org.apache.felix.framework-*.properties file in the L installation directory, or query the L API endpoint /api/jsonws/license/get-current-build-infoAffected if The version falls within >= 2023.Q3.1 and < 2023.Q3.7, or >= 2023.Q4.0 and < 2023.Q4.5, or equals 7.3 or 7.4 for DXP; or >= 7.4.3.35 and < 7.4.3.111 for Portal
-
Confirm Calendar widget is activeNavigate to Site Administration > Site Builder > Pages, or check the L database table layout for pages containing portlet ID com_lifercalendar_portlet_CalendarPortlet, or inspect the OSGi console for com_lifercalendar bundleAffected if The Calendar widget is deployed and active on any site or page within the instance
-
Check Calendar Name field is accessible to usersNavigate to the Calendar widget UI, click Add Event or Create Calendar, locate the Name field, or query the L database table calendar_calendar for entries with non-null name fieldsAffected if Users with contributor-level or higher permissions can access the Calendar Name input field
-
Inspect Calendar entries for malicious scriptsQuery the calendar_calendar table in the L database for Name field values containing script tags, html tags, or javascript: URIs; or manually review Calendar entries through the UI for unusual characters in the Name fieldAffected if Any Calendar Name entry contains encoded or raw HTML/JavaScript like <script>, javascript:, or event handlers such as onload/onerror
The environment is affected if running a vulnerable L version AND the Calendar widget is accessible to users who can create or edit calendar entries.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.4.3.1112023.Q3.72023.Q4.5
Update Liferay Portal/DXP to a patched version beyond the affected version ranges. Apply input validation and output encoding to the Calendar widget Name field to prevent XSS.
Upgrade to 2023.Q3.7, 2023.Q4.5, or 7.4.3.111 (or later) depending on your product line; for DXP 7.3/7.4 contact Lifer support for the specific fixed update
- 1. Identify the current Lifer Portal/DXP version by navigating to Control Panel > Configuration > Server Administration > Version
- 2. For DXP 2023.Q3.x instances: Plan upgrade to version 2023.Q3.7 or later
- 3. For DXP 2023.Q4.x instances: Plan upgrade to version 2023.Q4.5 or later
- 4. For Lifer Portal 7.4.3.x instances (where x >= 35): Plan upgrade to version 7.4.3.111 or later
- 5. For DXP 7.4 instances: Upgrade to the latest available update pack that includes the fix (update 93 or later)
- 6. For DXP 7.3 instances: Contact Lifer support for the specific fixed update pack
- 7. Before production deployment, test the upgrade in a staging environment to verify the Calendar widget functions correctly
- 8. After upgrade, verify the fix by attempting to create a Calendar with a malicious script in the Name field - it should be sanitized and not execute
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,888.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-43818 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-43818 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data