CVE-2025-43821
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Commerce Product Comparison Table widget in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.111, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.5, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.8, and 7.4 GA through update 92 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted payload injected into a Commerce Product's Name text field.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceStored XSS vulnerability in Lifer Portal's Commerce Product Comparison Table widget allows attackers to inject malicious scripts into the Commerce Product Name field, which executes when users view the product comparison table.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2023.q3.1, < 2023.q3.9>= 2023.q4.0, < 2023.q4.6= 7.4>= 7.4.0, < 7.4.3.112CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Lifer Portal or DXP installation versionAccess the Control Panel > Configuration > Server Administration > Product Information, or locate the liferay-version.properties file in the bundle. Alternatively, check the login page footer which often displays the version.Affected if The version is 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.111, or falls within 2023.q3.1 through 2023.q3.8, or 2023.q4.0 through 2023.q4.5.
-
Confirm Commerce module is enabledNavigate to Control Panel > Apps > App Manager, or check for the presence of the 'Commerce' menu option in the Control Panel sidebar.Affected if Commerce is installed and enabled on the Lifer instance.
-
Locate Commerce Product Comparison Table widget instancesGo to Site Administration > Pages > Pages, then use the Page Search or inspect each page in edit mode to find instances of the 'Product Comparison Table' widget within a Commerce widget page or widget frame.Affected if The Product Comparison Table widget is present on any published page.
-
Inspect Commerce Product catalog entriesAccess the Commerce Admin menu (Commerce > Products) and review the product names stored in the catalog. If you have admin access, you can query the Commerce database table (typically CommerceProduct or CommerceProductEntry) for the name field.Affected if Any product names exist in the catalog, particularly if they were entered by users without input sanitization.
You are affected if your Lifer Portal/DXP version is within the vulnerable ranges AND the Commerce module with the Product Comparison Table widget is enabled and populated with products.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.4.3.1122023.q3.92023.q4.6
Update to Lifer DXP 7.4 GA update 93 or later (or corresponding patched versions for DXP 2023.Q3/Q4 releases) to obtain the vendor patch; alternatively, implement input sanitization on the Product Name field before rendering.
Lifter Portal: 7.4.3.112+ | DXP 2023.Q3: 2023.Q3.9+ | DXP 2023.Q4: 2023.Q4.6+ | DXP 7.4: updates beyond 92
- 1. Identify the exact Liferay product and version currently running (Portal or Digital Experience Platform, and the specific version number)
- 2. For Liferay Portal 7.4.0-7.4.3.111: upgrade to version 7.4.3.112 or later
- 3. For Liferay DXP 2023.Q3.1-2023.Q3.8: upgrade to version 2023.Q3.9
- 4. For Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0-2023.Q4.5: upgrade to version 2023.Q4.6
- 5. For Liferay DXP 7.4 GA: upgrade to a version receiving updates beyond update 92
- 6. After upgrade, verify the Commerce Product Comparison Table widget functions correctly and test that XSS payloads in product names are no longer executable
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation3.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,272.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-43821 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-43821 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data