CVE-2025-43823
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Commerce Search Result widget in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.111, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4 before patch 6, 2023.Q3 before patch 9, and 7.4 GA through update 92 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted payload injected into a Commerce Product's Name text field.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceA stored XSS vulnerability exists in the Lifer Commerce Search Result widget where the Commerce Product Name field is not properly sanitized before rendering. Attackers can inject malicious JavaScript/HTML into the Product Name, which executes when users view the search results.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2023.q3.1, < 2023.q3.9>= 2023.q4.0, < 2023.q4.6= 7.4>= 7.4.0, < 7.4.3.112CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Lifer Portal/DXP versionAccess the Lifer Control Panel > Configuration > Server Administration > Product Information, or check the portal-ext.properties file for the version propertyAffected if The version falls within >= 2023.q3.1 and < 2023.q3.9, OR >= 2023.q4.0 and < 2023.q4.6, OR equals 7.4, OR >= 7.4.0 and < 7.4.3.112
-
Verify Commerce module is enabledNavigate to Control Panel > Apps > Lifer Marketplace, search for Commerce, and confirm it is installed and activeAffected if Commerce module is installed and running on the system
-
Confirm Search Result widget usageCheck Site Pages for any instance of the Commerce Search Result widget, or review the widget configuration in the Lifer page editorAffected if The Commerce Search Result widget is added to any page in the environment
-
Review Commerce Product creation permissionsGo to Control Panel > Users > Roles, locate the Commerce Product creator role, and check which users or organizations are assigned permission to create Commerce ProductsAffected if Multiple untrusted users or external roles have permissions to create or edit Commerce Products, allowing potential injection of malicious Product Names
You are affected if running an affected Lifer version with the Commerce module and Search Result widget enabled, and untrusted users can create Commerce Products whose names could be rendered without sanitization.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.4.3.1122023.q3.92023.q4.6
Apply the vendor patches for the affected Lifer Portal/DXP versions (2023.Q4 patch 6, 2023.Q3 patch 9, or 7.4 update 93+). As a temporary workaround, restrict Commerce Product creation permissions to trusted users only.
Liferay Portal 7.4.3.112+; Lifford DXP 2023.q3.9+; Lifford DXP 2023.q4.6+
- 1. Identify the exact Lifford product and version currently deployed (Portal or DXP, and specific version number)
- 2. For Lifford Portal 7.4.x users: Upgrade to version 7.4.3.112 or later
- 3. For Lifford DXP 2023.Q3 users: Apply patch 9 or later (upgrade to 2023.q3.9 or later)
- 4. For Lifford DXP 2023.Q4 users: Apply patch 6 or later (upgrade to 2023.q4.6 or later)
- 5. After upgrade, verify the Commerce Search Result widget functions correctly with the fixed version
- 6. Test that the Commerce Product Name field properly sanitizes input to confirm the XSS fix is applied
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-43823 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-43823 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data