CVE-2025-4388
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.131, and Liferay DXP 2024.Q4.0 through 2024.Q4.5, 2024.Q3.1 through 2024.Q3.13, 2024.Q2.0 through 2024.Q2.13, 2024.Q1.1 through 2024.Q1.12, 7.4 GA through update 92 allows an remote non-authenticated attacker to inject JavaScript into the modules/apps/marketplace/marketplace-app-manager-web.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceReflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Lifer L Portal and DXP's marketplace-app-manager-web module allows unauthenticated remote attackers to inject arbitrary JavaScript via unspecified parameters in the affected URL path.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 2024.Q1.1, < 2024.Q1.13>= 2024.q2.0, < 2024.q4.6= 7.4>= 7.4.0, < 7.4.3.132CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check your Lifer Portal versionLocate the Lifer portal-ext.properties or portal.properties file (typically in the Lifer home directory or WEB-INF/classes). Look for the 'iver.version' property, or check the Lifer login page footer which displays the running version. Alternatively, inspect the MANIFEST.MF file in the core portal JAR (portal-impl.jar) for the Bundle-Version attribute.Affected if The version is 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.131 (inclusive), or the version string starts with 7.4 but is below 7.4.3.132.
-
Check your Lifer DXP versionIn the Lifer DXP digital experience platform, access the Control Panel > Configuration > Server Administration > Product Information, or check the osgi/state directory for bundle version files. The version typically appears as a quarterly release such as 2024.Q1.x, 2024.Q2.x, or 2024.Q4.x.Affected if The DXP version is 2024.Q1.1 through 2024.Q1.12 (inclusive), 2024.Q2.0 through 2024.Q4.5 (inclusive), or specifically 7.4.
-
Verify marketplace-app-manager-web module is deployedAccess the Lifer Control Panel > Configuration > System Settings > Gogo Shell. Execute the command 'lb marketplace-app-manager-web' or 'lb | grep marketplace' to list the marketplace-related bundles and confirm the module is loaded in the OSGi runtime.Affected if The marketplace-app-manager-web bundle appears in the active bundles list with a state of ACTIVE.
-
Inspect URL handling for the affected pathReview the web server access logs or proxy logs for requests to paths containing 'marketplace-app-manager-web' or marketplace-related endpoints. Look for any URL parameters that may be reflected in the response without proper encoding.Affected if The server responds with pages containing URL parameter values from requests targeting the marketplace-app-manager-web module path.
You are affected if your Lifer Portal is version 7.4.0-7.4.3.131, or your Lifer DXP is version 2024.Q1.1-2024.Q1.12, 2024.Q2.0-2024.Q4.5, or 7.4, AND the marketplace-app-manager-web module is deployed and accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped7.4.3.1322024.Q1.132024.q4.6
Apply vendor-supplied patches or upgrade to a Lifer L version beyond the vulnerable ranges (7.4.3.132+ or corresponding DXP updates) to remediate the XSS in the marketplace-app-manager-web.
Upgrade to the appropriate fixed version: Liferay Portal 7.4.3.132+; DXP 2024.Q1.13+; DXP 2024.Q2.13+; DXP 2024.Q4.6+
- 1. Identify the exact Liferay product and version currently running (Portal or DXP, and the specific version number from the affected ranges)
- 2. For Liferay Portal 7.4.x: upgrade to version 7.4.3.132 or later
- 3. For Liferay DXP 2024.Q1.x: upgrade to version 2024.Q1.13 or later
- 4. For Liferay DXP 2024.Q2.x: upgrade to version 2024.Q2.13 or later
- 5. For Liferay DXP 2024.Q4.x: upgrade to version 2024.Q4.6 or later
- 6. After upgrade, verify the marketplace-app-manager-web module is functioning correctly and the XSS vulnerability is resolved by testing that special characters in URLs are properly escaped
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,328.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-4388 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-4388 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data