CVE-2025-44033
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSQL injection vulnerability in oa_system oasys v.1.1 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the allDirector() method declaration in src/main/java/cn/gson/oasys/mappers/AddressMapper.java
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSQL injection vulnerability in oa_system oasys v1.1 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code through the allDirector() method in the AddressMapper.java file. The vulnerability exists due to improper handling of SQL queries in the MyBatis mapper, likely due to string concatenation instead of parameterized queries.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Aaluoxiang Oa System (oasys) is installedSearch for oasys application files, typical deployment locations include webapp directories, or check running Java processes for oasys-related WAR/EAR filesAffected if The oasys application is present on the system
-
Confirm the installed oasys versionCheck application metadata files such as version manifest, pom.xml, or application configuration files for version 1.1Affected if The installed version is exactly 1.1
-
Locate AddressMapper.java in the deploymentSearch for AddressMapper.java file within the oasys application source or decompiled classes, typically found in the mapper or DAO layerAffected if AddressMapper.java exists and contains the allDirector() method
-
Verify the allDirector() method uses dynamic SQLInspect AddressMapper.java source or decompiled bytecode, look for string concatenation or unparameterized queries in the allDirector() methodAffected if The allDirector() method constructs SQL queries using unsanitized input concatenation
-
Check if the oasys application is network accessibleTest network connectivity to the oasys web interface on common ports (8080, 80, 443) or review firewall rules and web server bindingsAffected if The application accepts remote connections and exposes endpoints that could reach the vulnerable method
You are affected if Aaluoxiang Oa System version 1.1 is installed and the AddressMapper.java file with the vulnerable allDirector() method is present and accessible.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReplace dynamic SQL queries in AddressMapper.java with parameterized queries using MyBatis prepared statement syntax; validate and sanitize all inputs to the allDirector() method before database execution.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-44033 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-44033 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data