CVE-2025-44957
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedRuckus SmartZone (SZ) before 6.1.2p3 Refresh Build allows authentication bypass via a valid API key and crafted HTTP headers.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceRuckus SmartZone wireless controller versions before 6.1.2p3 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability. Attackers with a valid API key can send specially crafted HTTP headers that cause the application to bypass authentication checks, potentially allowing unauthorized access to administrative functions or data that should require additional verification.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.1.2= 6.1.2= 7.0.0= 7.1.0< 4.5.0.51CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed product and versionAccess the SmartZone admin UI or use CLI command 'show version' to determine if the device is running Ruckus SmartZone or Ruckus Network Director and note the exact firmware version.Affected if The product is SmartZone with version < 6.1.2, = 6.1.2, = 7.0.0, or = 7.1.0; or Network Director with version < 4.5.0.51.
-
Confirm API key authentication is configuredIn the SmartZone admin UI, navigate to Administration > API Settings or inspect the file /root/ruckus-sz/etc/APIConfig.xml (if accessible) to verify if API key-based authentication is enabled.Affected if API key authentication is enabled and the version falls within the affected range.
-
Review API access logs for anomalous header patternsExamine API access logs (typically located in /var/log/ruckus-sz/api-access.log or via the admin UI Logs section) for requests containing non-standard or malformed HTTP headers, especially those with authentication-related header manipulation.Affected if Logs show API requests with crafted headers that bypassed normal authentication flow.
-
Check for unauthorized administrative account creationIn the SmartZone admin UI, review Administration > Administrators or use CLI command 'show administrators' to list all administrative accounts and look for any unexpected accounts created after the vulnerability disclosure date.Affected if New administrative accounts exist that were not created by authorized personnel.
A user is affected if their Ruckus SmartZone version is below 6.1.2p3 (or matches 6.1.2, 7.0.0, 7.1.0) or Network Director is below 4.5.0.51, AND API key authentication is enabled in their environment.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped4.5.0.516.1.2
Upgrade Ruckus SmartZone to version 6.1.2p3 Refresh Build or later. Additionally, audit API key usage and implement key rotation policies to limit exposure if keys are compromised.
Ruckus SmartZone: 6.1.2p3 Refresh Build or later; Ruckus Network Director: 4.5.0.51 or later
- Identify your current Ruckus SmartZone firmware version by navigating to Administration > System > Firmware Upgrade in the SmartZone web interface
- Identify your current Ruckus Network Director version in the web interface
- Download the fixed firmware version (6.1.2p3 Refresh Build or later) from the official Ruckus/CommScope support portal
- For SmartZone: If running version 6.1.2, 7.0.0, or 7.1.0, upgrade to 6.1.2p3 Refresh Build or a later stable release
- For Network Director: If running a version before 4.5.0.51, upgrade to version 4.5.0.51 or later
- Upload and install the firmware through the SmartZone admin interface, following standard firmware upgrade procedures
- After upgrade, verify the authentication bypass vulnerability is resolved by testing API key authentication with crafted HTTP headers
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-44957 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-44957 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data