CVE-2025-45057
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedD-Link DI-8300 v16.07.26A1 was discovered to contain a buffer overflow via the ip parameter in the ip_position_asp function. This vulnerability allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted input.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the ip_position_asp function of D-Link DI-8300 router firmware v16.07.26A1. The vulnerability is triggered via the ip parameter, allowing attackers to send crafted input that overflows a buffer, leading to Denial of Service. The CVSS 7.5 score indicates high severity due to the potential for service disruption.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 16.07.26a1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the device modelAccess the router admin interface or check the device label to confirm the model is D-Link DI-8300Affected if Device is not a D-Link DI-8300 model, then not affected
-
Check the firmware versionLog into the router web interface and navigate to Status or System Info page to view the firmware version, or use command line: cat /proc/version or grep the firmware fileAffected if Firmware version is exactly 16.07.26A1 - this is the only affected version listed
-
Verify the ip_position_asp function is accessibleCheck if the router web interface is accessible and examine HTTP requests to /ip_position.asp or similar endpoints that would invoke the ip_position_asp functionAffected if The web management interface is enabled and exposed, and the ip_position_asp endpoint exists and accepts ip parameter input
-
Look for signs of exploitation or crashCheck router system logs for unexpected reboots, crashes, or buffer overflow indicators. Review web server logs for suspicious requests with unusually long ip parameter valuesAffected if Device exhibits unexplained crashes, DoS symptoms, or logs show abnormal ip parameter patterns
A user is affected only if they have a D-Link DI-8300 router running firmware version 16.07.26A1 with the web management interface enabled and the ip_position_asp function exposed.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedContact D-Link support to verify if a firmware patch is available; if not, consider network segmentation to limit exposure and implement input validation at upstream network devices. For long-term remediation, the ip_position_asp function must be rewritten with proper bounds checking on the ip parameter.
Latest available DI-8300 firmware from D-Link official support channels (check www.dlink.com.cn or www.dlink.com for version newer than 16.07.26a1)
- 1. Visit the official D-Link support website (www.dlink.com or www.dlink.com.cn) and navigate to the DI-8300 product support page.
- 2. Check the firmware download section for any available updates newer than version 16.07.26a1.
- 3. Download the latest available firmware version from D-Link's official site.
- 4. Access the DI-8300 router web management interface.
- 5. Navigate to the firmware upgrade or system settings section.
- 6. Upload and apply the new firmware file, ensuring power is not interrupted during the process.
- 7. After the router reboots, verify the new firmware version is installed correctly.
- 8. Test that the ip_position_asp function and related network features work properly after the upgrade.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-45057 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-45057 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data