Improper Access ControlWeakness · CWE-284

CVE-2025-45422

HIGH · 8.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-07-09
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
87/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable Zero-click 6 weeks old

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Incorrect access control in Proximus b-box v8c.725A allows authenticated attackers to bypass normal restrictions and make arbitrary changes to port forwarding rules.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Incorrect access control in Proximus b-box v8c.725A router allows authenticated attackers to bypass normal authorization restrictions and make arbitrary changes to port forwarding rules. An attacker with valid credentials can modify port forwarding configurations beyond their intended permissions, potentially exposing internal services or enabling external access to sensitive systems.

MitigationApply vendor firmware updates when available; if no patch exists, consider network segmentation, restricting administrative access to trusted networks only, or replacing the affected device.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify router model and firmware version
    Access the router admin interface (typically via web browser at 192.168.1.1) or check via diagnostic commands. Look for the device model (b-box v8c) and firmware version (725A) in the status or system information page.
    Affected if The router is a Proximus b-box v8c running firmware version 725A or earlier
  2. Verify port forwarding feature is enabled
    Navigate to the router admin interface and locate the port forwarding or virtual server configuration section. Check if any port forwarding rules are defined or if the feature is accessible.
    Affected if Port forwarding configuration is accessible and rules can be defined or modified
  3. Review existing port forwarding rules
    In the router admin interface port forwarding section, inspect all configured rules. Note the source IP, external port, internal IP, and internal port for each rule.
    Affected if Any port forwarding rule exists that was not authorized or that exposes unexpected internal services
  4. Check user account privileges
    In the router admin interface user management or account settings, examine all defined user accounts and their assigned privilege levels. Verify if there are multiple accounts with different permission tiers.
    Affected if Multiple user accounts exist and the privilege separation for port forwarding is not properly enforced

A user is affected if they operate a Proximus b-box v8c router on firmware 725A or earlier and the port forwarding feature is accessible to authenticated users beyond their intended permission scope.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor firmware updates when available; if no patch exists, consider network segmentation, restricting administrative access to trusted networks only, or replacing the affected device.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
7.0 hours of engineering $1,240
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-45422 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-45422 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data