CVE-2025-45472
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedInsecure permissions in autodeploy-layer v1.2.0 allows attackers to escalate privileges and compromise the customer cloud account.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceautodeploy-layer v1.2.0 contains insecure permissions that enable privilege escalation, potentially allowing attackers to move laterally and compromise the customer cloud account. The vulnerability appears to stem from overly permissive IAM-style access controls or role configurations within the deployment component.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 1.2.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Lumigo Autodeploy Layer installationCheck your Lambda functions, CloudFormation stacks, or infrastructure-as-code definitions for a component named 'autodeploy-layer' or 'lumigo-autodeploy'Affected if The component is present in your environment and version is 1.2.0 or lower
-
Determine installed versionInspect the version metadata of the autodeploy-layer component: check Lambda layer version, container image tag, or package version in your deployment artifactsAffected if Version is 1.2.0 or any version lower than 1.2.0
-
Review IAM roles attached to autodeploy-layerList IAM roles associated with the autodeploy-layer Lambda function or compute resource: use AWS CLI 'aws iam list-roles' and filter by naming patterns like 'autodeploy', or examine role trust policiesAffected if Roles exist with names containing 'autodeploy' or 'lumigo' and are attached to this component
-
Audit IAM policies attached to autodeploy-layer rolesRetrieve the inline or managed policies attached to the autodeploy-layer IAM role: use 'aws iam get-role-policy' and 'aws iam list-attached-role-policies'Affected if Policies contain overly broad permissions such as '*' actions, wildcard resources, or permissions beyond deployment-related tasks (e.g., Describe*, Get*, or admin-like privileges)
-
Check for cross-account or wildcard principal accessExamine the trust policy (AssumeRolePolicyDocument) of autodeploy-layer IAM roles for wildcard principals (Principal: "*") or unexpected external account accessAffected if Trust policy allows unauthorized principals or accounts to assume the role
You are affected if the Lumigo Autodeploy Layer version 1.2.0 or lower is deployed in your environment and its associated IAM roles contain overly permissive or wildcard permissions that exceed minimal deployment needs.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataReview and remediate the permission model in autodeploy-layer v1.2.0 to enforce least-privilege access controls; validate that deployed roles and policies restrict actions to only those necessary for the component's function.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,488.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-45472 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-45472 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data