SQL InjectionWeakness · CWE-89

CVE-2025-4568

CRITICAL · 9.3 CVSS v4.0 Published 2025-06-05
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Improper neutralization of input provided by an unauthorized user into changes__reference_id parameter in URL allows for boolean-based Blind SQL Injection attacks.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A boolean-based blind SQL injection vulnerability exists in the changes__reference_id parameter in the application URL. An unauthenticated attacker can manipulate this parameter to inject malicious SQL queries and potentially extract sensitive data from the database, modify data, or compromise the underlying system.

MitigationImplement parameterized queries (prepared statements) for all database operations using the changes__reference_id parameter, apply strict input validation, and consider deploying a WAF rule as an interim control.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
Authentication
X
User interaction
None
Scope
X

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if the application uses the changes__reference_id parameter
    Search application logs, proxy records, or URL parameter listings for any request containing 'changes__reference_id' as a query parameter
    Affected if Any HTTP request to the application includes the changes__reference_id parameter in the URL
  2. Determine if the parameter is accessible without authentication
    Attempt to access an endpoint using the changes__reference_id parameter without providing authentication credentials
    Affected if The parameter can be reached without requiring login or session tokens
  3. Test for boolean-based blind SQL injection behavior
    Send two requests with the parameter set to different values: one that evaluates to TRUE (e.g., changes__reference_id=1 AND 1=1) and one that evaluates to FALSE (e.g., changes__reference_id=1 AND 1=2). Compare the HTTP response codes, response times, or body content between the two requests
    Affected if The application exhibits different behavior (different responses, delays, or content) between the TRUE and FALSE conditions, indicating the parameter is being interpreted as SQL
  4. Review database query logs for suspicious patterns
    Examine database logs, slow query logs, or Web Application Firewall logs for entries containing 'changes__reference_id' combined with SQL operators such as AND, OR, UNION, or comparative operators
    Affected if Database logs show queries with the parameter being concatenated with SQL syntax rather than passed as a bound parameter value
  5. Inspect application source code for the parameter handler
    Locate the code handling the changes__reference_id parameter and verify whether database queries use prepared statements or parameterized queries with bound variables
    Affected if The code constructs SQL queries by concatenating or interpolating the parameter value directly into the query string without using parameterized queries

The environment is affected if the changes__reference_id parameter is exposed in application URLs and responds differently to true/false SQL conditions, indicating unauthenticated SQL injection is possible.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement parameterized queries (prepared statements) for all database operations using the changes__reference_id parameter, apply strict input validation, and consider deploying a WAF rule as an interim control.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation16.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
34.0 hours of engineering $6,000
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $9,600.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-4568 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-4568 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data