CVE-2025-45854
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · unedited/server/executeExec of JEHC-BPM 2.0.1 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via execParams.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceJEHC-BPM 2.0.1 contains a command injection vulnerability in the /server/executeExec endpoint. The execParams parameter is directly used in system command execution without proper sanitization, allowing unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands with the privileges of the application server.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 2.0.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify JEHC-BPM installation and versionLocate the JEHC-BPM application in your environment and determine its installed version number. Check application banners, deployment metadata, or installation directories for version information.Affected if The installed version is JEHC-BPM 2.0.1 or any earlier version (anything <= 2.0.1).
-
Confirm /server/executeExec endpoint existsProbe your JEHC-BPM server for the presence of the /server/executeExec endpoint by making an HTTP request to this path (e.g., GET or POST to http://[host]/server/executeExec).Affected if The endpoint responds and is accessible (no 404 or authentication requirement blocks the request).
-
Verify execParams parameter handlingReview the application configuration or source code to determine whether the execParams parameter passed to the executeExec endpoint undergoes input sanitization or validation before being used in command execution.Affected if No input validation, sanitization, or allowlisting is applied to the execParams parameter before it is used in system command execution.
A system is affected if it runs JEHC-BPM version 2.0.1 or earlier and has the /server/executeExec endpoint accessible without proper input validation on the execParams parameter.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataRestrict network access to the vulnerable endpoint immediately. If possible, disable the /server/executeExec function until a vendor patch is available. Implement strict input validation and use parameterized execution methods instead of string concatenation for system calls.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $12,352.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-45854 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-45854 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data