CVE-2025-4596
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAsseco ADMX system is used for processing medical records. It allows logged in users to access medical files belonging to other users through manipulation of GET arguments containing document IDs. This issue has been fixed in 6.09.01.62 version of ADMX.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability in the Asseco ADMX medical records system. Authenticated users can view medical files belonging to other users by manipulating document IDs in GET request parameters, indicating missing or inadequate authorization checks on file access operations.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- Authentication
- X
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- X
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Asseco ADMX installationSearch for ADMX system components or services: check for directories named 'ADMX' or 'admx' in common application paths (C:\Program Files, C:\inetpub, /var/www, /opt), or look for running processes named 'admx' or 'ADMX' in Task Manager (Windows) or ps/ps aux (Linux)Affected if The Asseco ADMX medical records system is present in the environment
-
Locate ADMX version informationCheck common version file locations: look for version.txt, about.ini, or similar in the ADMX installation directory; also check the application's main executable (often named admx.exe or similar) and right-click for Properties > Details to view File Version; alternatively, check the Windows Registry under HKLM\SOFTWARE\Asseco\ADMX or HKLM\SOFTWARE\WOW6432Node\Asseco\ADMX for a Version or InstallPath valueAffected if The installed version is lower than 6.09.01.62 (the patched version)
-
Identify document access endpointsReview web server configuration (IIS, Apache, Nginx) hosting the ADMX application for URL patterns that handle document or file retrieval, such as paths containing 'document', 'file', 'download', 'view', 'medical' or numeric ID parameters; check web.config (IIS) or .htaccess (Apache) for routing rules related to file accessAffected if The application exposes HTTP endpoints that accept document IDs as GET parameters for file retrieval
-
Verify authorization on document accessAs an authenticated user with standard access, attempt to access a medical document by directly modifying the document ID parameter in a known file retrieval URL (e.g., changing ?id=123 to ?id=124); compare the response: if the system returns a medical file or document that belongs to a different user without returning a 403 Forbidden or authorization error, the IDOR vulnerability is presentAffected if The system allows retrieval of documents belonging to other users by simply changing the document ID parameter without proper authorization validation
A defender is affected if the Asseco ADMX system is installed and the installed version is lower than 6.09.01.62, AND the document retrieval endpoints do not properly validate that the authenticated user has permission to access the requested medical file.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to version 6.09.01.62 or later. Additionally, implement proper authorization validation to ensure users can only access medical documents they are explicitly permitted to view.
6.09.01.62
- Upgrade Asseco ADMX system to version 6.09.01.62 or later to address the IDOR vulnerability
- After upgrade, verify that proper authorization checks are enforced when accessing medical files via document IDs in GET arguments
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,416.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-4596 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-4596 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data