dbcve.org
System PdvApplication · System Pdv Project

CVE-2025-45968

CRITICAL · 9.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-08-25
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
100/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Public exploit Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An issue in System PDV v1.0 allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information via the hash parameter in a URL. The application contains an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability, which occurs due to a lack of proper authorization checks when accessing objects referenced by this parameter. This allows direct access to other users' data or internal resources without proper permission. Successful exploitation of this flaw may result in the exposure of sensitive information.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

System PDV v1.0 contains an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability where the application fails to perform proper authorization validation on the 'hash' parameter in URLs. This allows unauthenticated remote attackers to directly access sensitive data or internal resources belonging to other users by manipulating the hash parameter value.

MitigationImplement proper authorization checks to verify the requesting user has permission to access the object referenced by the hash parameter. Additionally, consider replacing direct object references with indirect references (mapping internal IDs to random unique identifiers) to prevent enumeration attacks.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
System PdvApplication
Affected:= 1.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm installed version
    Identify the installed version of System Pdv Project System Pdv by checking the application documentation, headers, or version file. Compare against the affected version = 1.0.
    Affected if The installed version is System Pdv v1.0 exactly.
  2. Locate hash parameter usage
    Review application URLs and API endpoints to identify if a 'hash' parameter is used to reference resources, objects, or data. Inspect URL patterns such as ?hash=VALUE or similar constructs.
    Affected if The application uses a 'hash' parameter in URLs to access specific data or resources.
  3. Test authorization on hash parameter
    With the application running, attempt to access a URL with a 'hash' parameter value that references a resource belonging to a different user or entity, without authenticating or with a different user account.
    Affected if Unauthenticated or unauthorized access to hash-referenced resources succeeds, revealing data belonging to other users.
  4. Verify lack of ownership validation
    Examine application responses when providing a valid hash value that belongs to another user account. Check if the response returns the actual content without verifying the requesting user's ownership or permissions.
    Affected if The application returns sensitive data for a hash value without validating that the requesting user owns or has permission to access that resource.

A user is affected if running System Pdv v1.0 and the application permits unauthenticated or unauthorized access to data via the 'hash' parameter without validating user ownership.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement proper authorization checks to verify the requesting user has permission to access the object referenced by the hash parameter. Additionally, consider replacing direct object references with indirect references (mapping internal IDs to random unique identifiers) to prevent enumeration attacks.

Fix this in System Pdv Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-45968 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

Get it on GitHub Scan in the browser

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-45968 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data