DirectorApplication · Automai

CVE-2025-46068

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2026-01-12
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
94/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
An issue in Automai Director v.25.2.0 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the update mechanism

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Automai Director version 25.2.0 contains a vulnerability in its update mechanism that allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code. The update process presumably lacks proper validation of update packages or their source, enabling injection of malicious code that executes with the privileges of the update service.

MitigationDisable or restrict the update mechanism until an official patch is available; implement network-level controls to limit which systems can communicate with update servers, and monitor for suspicious update activity.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
DirectorApplication
Affected:= 25.2.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Automai Director version
    Check the installed Automai Director version - typically found in the application itself (Help > About), installation directory metadata, or Windows Programs and Features
    Affected if Version is exactly 25.2.0
  2. Verify update mechanism is configured
    Check if the Automai Director update service/feature is enabled. This is usually configurable in the application's settings or administration console under update/upgrade settings
    Affected if The update mechanism is enabled and pointing to update servers
  3. Examine update server configuration
    Inspect the update configuration files or registry entries that define the update server URL endpoint. Look for any custom or unexpected update URLs
    Affected if Update server URL is reachable from the system and not restricted to internal/approved sources
  4. Check service account privileges
    Review the Windows service or daemon account under which the Automai Director update service runs, using Services.msc or equivalent
    Affected if The update service runs with elevated or privileged account (such as SYSTEM, administrator, or service account with excessive permissions)
  5. Review network exposure
    Determine if the system can initiate outbound connections to update servers or if there are firewall/network controls restricting this communication
    Affected if The system has unrestricted outbound network access to external update endpoints

You are affected if Automai Director version 25.2.0 is installed and the update mechanism is enabled, allowing the system to receive updates from external sources.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Disable or restrict the update mechanism until an official patch is available; implement network-level controls to limit which systems can communicate with update servers, and monitor for suspicious update activity.

Fix this in Director Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation6.0 h
  • Implementation12.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
28.0 hours of engineering $4,980
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,968.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-46068 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-46068 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data