CVE-2025-46192
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSourceCodester Client Database Management System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in user_payment_update.php via the order_id POST parameter.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceSourceCodester Client Database Management System 1.0 contains a critical SQL injection vulnerability in user_payment_update.php where the order_id POST parameter is not properly sanitized before being used in SQL queries. This allows unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary SQL commands, potentially leading to unauthorized database access, data exfiltration, or complete system compromise.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm the application versionIdentify if the installed system is SourceCodester or Lerouxyxchire Client Database Management System version 1.0 by checking the application documentation, headers, or any version file included in the deploymentAffected if The installed application is Client Database Management System version 1.0
-
Locate the vulnerable PHP fileSearch the web root directory for the file named user_payment_update.phpAffected if The file user_payment_update.php exists in the web accessible directory
-
Check if the file is accessibleVerify that user_payment_update.php can be reached via HTTP/HTTPS requests to the web serverAffected if The file is accessible over the network without authentication
-
Inspect the order_id parameter handlingExamine the source code of user_payment_update.php and locate the code handling the order_id POST parameter to confirm it is directly used in SQL queries without prepared statements or input sanitizationAffected if The order_id POST parameter is used directly in SQL queries without parameterized queries or proper input validation
A system is affected if it runs Client Database Management System version 1.0 with the user_payment_update.php file accessible and the order_id parameter handled without parameterized queries.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataRemediate by replacing dynamic SQL queries with parameterized queries (prepared statements) and implementing strict input validation on the order_id parameter. Apply principle of least privilege to database accounts.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-46192 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-46192 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data