Missing AuthorizationWeakness · CWE-862

CVE-2025-46258

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-06-05
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
60/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Missing Authorization vulnerability in BdThemes Element Pack Pro allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Element Pack Pro: from n/a before 8.0.0.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Missing authorization vulnerability in BdThemes Element Pack Pro allows authenticated users to exploit incorrectly configured access control security levels, potentially enabling unauthorized access to privileged functionality or data that should be restricted based on user roles or permissions.

MitigationUpdate Element Pack Pro to version 8.0.0 or later to remediate the authorization flaw. Verify access controls are functioning correctly after the update.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Element Pack Pro is installed
    Check your WordPress plugin directory or admin panel for the BdThemes Element Pack Pro plugin
    Affected if The plugin is present in the WordPress installation
  2. Identify the installed version
    Navigate to WordPress Admin > Plugins > Element Pack Pro and read the version number displayed, or inspect the plugin main file header for the Version field
    Affected if The version is below 8.0.0 (e.g., 7.x.x, 6.x.x, etc.)
  3. Verify access control modules are in use
    Review the Element Pack Pro settings pages for any configured access controls, role restrictions, or security level settings that control user access to specific widgets or features
    Affected if Access control restrictions or user role limitations are configured within the plugin settings
  4. Test for unauthorized access potential
    Using a lower-privileged authenticated user account (e.g., subscriber or editor role), attempt to access features or data that should be restricted to administrator or higher roles based on Element Pack Pro configurations
    Affected if A lower-privileged user can access functionality or data that should be restricted to higher-privileged roles

The environment is affected if Element Pack Pro version is below 8.0.0 and the plugin's role-based access control features are enabled or configured in the WordPress site.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Update Element Pack Pro to version 8.0.0 or later to remediate the authorization flaw. Verify access controls are functioning correctly after the update.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

Element Pack Pro 8.0.0

  1. Check current Element Pack Pro version in WordPress dashboard under Plugins
  2. Backup your WordPress site before updating
  3. Update Element Pack Pro to version 8.0.0 via WordPress plugin repository or upload manually
  4. Verify the update completed successfully
  5. Test that Element Pack Pro functionality works as expected
Caveat Review Element Pack Pro 8.0.0 changelog for any breaking changes or deprecated features before updating in production environments

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation1.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
7.0 hours of engineering $1,210
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,936.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-46258 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-46258 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data