CVE-2025-46405
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedWhen Network Access is configured on a BIG-IP APM virtual server, undisclosed traffic can cause the Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) to terminate. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA denial-of-service vulnerability exists in F5 BIG-IP APM where the Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) can terminate when Network Access is configured on an APM virtual server and the system receives undisclosed malicious traffic. This results in service disruption as TMM handles all traffic processing for the virtual server.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 15.1.0, < 15.1.10.8>= 16.1.0, < 16.1.6>= 17.1.0, < 17.1.2.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check the installed BIG-IP APM versionUse the command 'tmsh show /sys version' or access the BIG-IP GUI under System > Software Management > Software List to identify the installed version of BIG-IP and APM.Affected if The version falls within >= 15.1.0, < 15.1.10.8 OR >= 16.1.0, < 16.1.6 OR >= 17.1.0, < 17.1.2.2.
-
Confirm APM is provisionedRun 'tmsh show /sys provision' or check in the GUI under System > Resource Provisioning to verify that APM (Access Policy Manager) is provisioned on the system.Affected if APM is not provisioned, the vulnerability does not apply.
-
Identify APM virtual servers with Network Access configuredRun 'tmsh list /ltm virtual' to list all virtual servers, then filter for those with 'apm' profile or access policy assigned. Use 'tmsh list /ltm virtual <name> access-profile' to check each for an access profile.Affected if No APM virtual servers exist, the vulnerability cannot be exploited.
-
Verify Network Access is enabled on the APM policyAccess the APM configuration via 'tmsh edit /apm policy access-policy <policyname>' or through the GUI under Access Policy > Access Profiles. Inspect the policy to confirm the Network Access resource is included and active.Affected if The specific APM virtual server has Network Access resource configured and enabled in its access policy.
A user is affected if they run a vulnerable BIG-IP APM version with at least one APM virtual server that has Network Access functionality configured and enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped15.1.10.816.1.617.1.2.2
Apply the vendor patch when available. Until then, evaluate whether Network Access functionality is essential; if not, disable it on affected APM virtual servers to reduce attack surface. Implement additional network filtering upstream as a compensating control.
15.1.10.8 (or later 15.1.x), 16.1.6 (or later 16.1.x), or 17.1.2.2 (or later 17.1.x) depending on your major version branch
- 1. Inventory all BIG-IP APM systems to identify those running affected versions (15.1.0-15.1.10.7, 16.1.0-16.1.5, 17.1.0-17.1.2.1)
- 2. Determine which major version line (15.1.x, 16.1.x, or 17.1.x) each affected device is running
- 3. Schedule a maintenance window for the upgrade
- 4. Back up the BIG-IP configuration using 'tmsh save sys config' or via the web UI
- 5. Download the appropriate hotfix or upgrade image from F5 Networks (my.f5.com): For 15.1.x: 15.1.10.8 or later; For 16.1.x: 16.1.6 or later; For 17.1.x: 17.1.2.2 or later
- 6. Upload and install the upgrade image via tmsh ('tmsh install sys software') or the web UI
- 7. Reboot the device after upgrade completion
- 8. Verify the new version is running: 'tmsh show sys version'
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-46405 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-46405 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data