CVE-2025-46497
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Navegg Navegg Analytics navegg allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Navegg Analytics: from n/a through <= 3.3.3.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Navegg Analytics enables attackers to inject malicious scripts through Stored XSS by tricking authenticated users into submitting crafted requests. The stored payload persists in the application and executes when other users view the compromised content, potentially leading to session hijacking and credential theft.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Navegg Analytics installationSearch for Navegg Analytics in your web application directories, check installed packages, or review browser developer tools for navegg.com scripts loaded on pagesAffected if Navegg Analytics scripts or components are present in the environment
-
Determine installed Navegg Analytics versionCheck package.json, composer.json, or Navegg configuration files for version number; also inspect the navegg.js script for version identifiersAffected if The installed version does not include CSRF token validation in state-changing operations
-
Inspect state-changing forms for CSRF tokensReview forms that submit data to Navegg (e.g., settings, profile updates, analytics configuration) and verify each includes a synchronizer token in a hidden fieldAffected if Forms lack CSRF tokens or tokens are not validated server-side on submission
-
Test for stored XSS via form injectionSubmit a benign XSS payload (e.g., <img src=x onerror=alert(1)> in a text field that persists and is rendered to other users)Affected if The payload executes when viewing the submitted data, indicating stored XSS is possible
-
Check input validation and output encodingReview server-side code or Navegg settings for context-aware output encoding on user-supplied data that gets stored and displayedAffected if Input is stored without sanitization and rendered without encoding, allowing script execution
You are affected if Navegg Analytics is present and state-changing operations lack CSRF token protection, allowing attackers to inject persistent malicious scripts that execute for other users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement CSRF synchronizer tokens on all state-changing operations and enforce strict input validation with context-aware output encoding to prevent stored XSS execution.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-46497 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-46497 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data