Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)Weakness · CWE-352

CVE-2025-46498

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-04-24
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
61/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in nghialuu Zalo Official Live Chat zalo-official-live-chat allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Zalo Official Live Chat: from n/a through <= 1.0.0.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the Zalo Official Live Chat plugin (versions <= 1.0.0). The plugin fails to properly validate the origin of requests, allowing attackers to trick authenticated users into performing unintended actions such as sending chat messages or modifying settings. This is a standard CSRF attack vector exploiting the lack of anti-CSRF tokens in the plugin's forms and AJAX actions.

MitigationImplement anti-CSRF tokens (synchronizer token pattern) on all state-changing forms and AJAX endpoints, and validate the Referer/Origin header on server-side requests. Additionally, configure the SameSite attribute on session cookies.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check installed plugin version
    Locate the Zalo Official Live Chat plugin in your CMS/plugin directory and read the version information from the plugin header file (typically version.txt, readme.txt, or the main plugin PHP file). Compare it to the affected range: versions 1.0.0 and below are vulnerable.
    Affected if The installed version is 1.0.0 or any earlier version of the Zalo Official Live Chat plugin.
  2. Inspect plugin forms for CSRF tokens
    Examine the HTML source of all state-changing forms rendered by the plugin (e.g., settings forms, message sending forms). Look for a hidden input field containing a token value (commonly named '_wpnonce', 'csrf_token', 'nonce', or similar) within each <form> tag.
    Affected if No anti-CSRF token field is found in the plugin's HTML forms.
  3. Inspect AJAX endpoints for nonce verification
    Review the plugin's PHP source code that handles AJAX requests (typically in the main plugin file or dedicated AJAX handler files). Search for calls to nonce verification functions (e.g., 'check_ajax_referer', 'wp_verify_nonce', or equivalent validation logic) before processing state-changing requests.
    Affected if AJAX handlers lack nonce verification or the verification is missing/disabled.
  4. Check Referer/Origin header validation
    Examine the server-side PHP code that processes form submissions and AJAX requests. Look for validation of the HTTP Referer or Origin header to confirm the request originated from your legitimate site.
    Affected if No Referer or Origin header validation is performed on state-changing requests.
  5. Verify SameSite cookie configuration
    Inspect the session cookie or authentication cookie settings used by the plugin. Check if the SameSite attribute is set to 'Strict' or 'Lax' on cookie definitions.
    Affected if Cookies related to the plugin lack SameSite attribute or have it set to 'None' without Secure flag.

You are affected if the Zalo Official Live Chat plugin version is 1.0.0 or lower AND the plugin's forms lack CSRF tokens, AJAX endpoints lack nonce verification, and no Referer/Origin validation exists.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement anti-CSRF tokens (synchronizer token pattern) on all state-changing forms and AJAX endpoints, and validate the Referer/Origin header on server-side requests. Additionally, configure the SameSite attribute on session cookies.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,750
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-46498 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-46498 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data