CVE-2025-46504
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Olar Marius Vasaio QR Code vasaio-qr-code allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Vasaio QR Code: from n/a through <= 1.2.5.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA CSRF vulnerability in the Vasaio QR Code WordPress plugin (versions up to 1.2.5) enables attackers to inject malicious JavaScript via Stored XSS by tricking authenticated administrators into submitting crafted requests. The lack of proper CSRF token validation allows cross-site request forgery, and insufficient input sanitization leads to persistent script execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Vasaio QR Code plugin is installedNavigate to WordPress admin > Plugins and look for 'Vasaio QR Code' in the installed plugins listAffected if Plugin is installed and active
-
Check installed plugin versionIn Plugins list, find Vasaio QR Code and note the version number displayed below the plugin nameAffected if Version is 1.2.5 or lower
-
Confirm admin access existsVerify you have administrator-level access to the WordPress dashboard where the plugin settings are accessibleAffected if Administrator authentication is present (required for the attack vector)
-
Inspect plugin forms for CSRF protectionUse browser dev tools or view plugin source code to examine form submissions in the plugin admin pages; look for wp_nonce_field or similar nonce implementations in form handlersAffected if Forms lack nonce/tokens or do not verify CSRF tokens on submission
If Vasaio QR Code plugin versions 1.2.5 or lower are installed with an active admin session and the plugin forms lack CSRF token validation, the environment is vulnerable to CVE-2025-46504.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate Vasaio QR Code to the latest patched version; implement WordPress nonces for all form submissions and admin actions; sanitize and validate all user inputs and outputs.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-46504 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-46504 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data