CVE-2025-46530
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in HuangYe WuDeng Hacklog Remote Attachment hacklog-remote-attachment allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Hacklog Remote Attachment: from n/a through <= 1.3.2.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCSRF vulnerability in the Hacklog Remote Attachment WordPress plugin (versions <=1.3.2) allows authenticated administrators to be tricked into submitting malicious requests that inject persistent XSS payloads into the application, which then executes when other users view the stored content.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if Hacklog Remote Attachment plugin is installedNavigate to WordPress admin > Plugins, or inspect /wp-content/plugins/ directory for the hacklog-remote-attachment folderAffected if The plugin folder exists in the WordPress installation
-
Identify the installed plugin versionIn WordPress admin > Plugins, find Hacklog Remote Attachment and read the version number from the plugin description; alternatively, check the main plugin PHP file for the 'Version' header in the plugin comment blockAffected if Version displayed is 1.3.2 or lower
-
Verify the plugin is activeIn WordPress admin > Plugins, confirm the plugin shows as 'Active' under the plugin statusAffected if Plugin is currently activated on the site
-
Confirm no custom CSRF protections exist in plugin codeInspect the plugin's PHP files (especially those handling form submissions or admin actions) and search for wp_nonce_field, wp_nonce_url, or check_admin_referer function calls; absence of these indicates vulnerabilityAffected if No WordPress nonce verification functions are present in the plugin's action handlers
If Hacklog Remote Attachment is installed, active, and version 1.3.2 or lower, the environment is affected by this CSRF-to-persistent-XSS vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataImplement WordPress nonces and CSRF tokens for all state-changing operations, validate the Origin and Referer headers on POST requests, and sanitize/validate all user-supplied input before storage and output.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-46530 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-46530 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data