CVE-2025-46539
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in WPFable Fable Extra fable-extra allows Blind SQL Injection.This issue affects Fable Extra: from n/a through <= 1.0.6.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA blind SQL injection vulnerability in WPFable Fable Extra (version <= 1.0.6) allows remote attackers to inject malicious SQL commands through unsanitized input parameters. The 'blind' classification indicates the application does not return direct SQL query output but allows inference through behavioral differences, enabling data exfiltration or database compromise.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Fable Extra installationLocate the Fable Extra package or application in your environment and determine its installed version number. Common methods include checking package.json, assembly info, or the application's about/version dialog.Affected if The installed version is 1.0.6 or lower, indicating the vulnerable version range.
-
Confirm database connectivityInspect whether the application has an active database connection or uses any database functionality. Check configuration files or runtime settings for database connection strings.Affected if The application connects to a database, which is required for SQL injection to be exploitable.
-
Locate SQL query implementationsReview the application codebase for direct SQL query execution patterns, such as string concatenation or unsanitized string interpolation being used in database queries.Affected if Raw SQL queries exist that accept user input without parameterized query handling or ORM usage.
-
Inspect input handling mechanismsExamine how user-supplied parameters are processed before being passed to database queries. Look for lack of input validation, sanitization, or use of parameterized queries.Affected if User input flows directly into SQL queries without prepared statements, stored procedures, or ORM parameter binding.
Your environment is affected if Fable Extra version 1.0.6 or lower is installed and the application uses database functionality with SQL queries that accept unsanitized user input.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpgrade to a patched version of Fable Extra and refactor all database queries to use parameterized queries or an ORM with proper input sanitization. Conduct a comprehensive code review to identify and remediate all SQL injection entry points.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $10,240.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-46539 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-46539 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data