Zxcloud GoldendbApplication · Zte

CVE-2025-46580

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2025-04-27
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 6.1.03.11 or later.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
There is a code-related vulnerability in the GoldenDB database product. Attackers can access system tables to disrupt the normal operation of business SQL.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

GoldenDB has an authorization vulnerability allowing attackers to bypass normal access controls and access system tables. This enables disruption of business SQL operations by manipulating metadata that the database relies upon for query processing.

MitigationApply vendor patches for GoldenDB and review role-based access control configurations to ensure business users cannot access system tables.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Zxcloud GoldendbApplication
Affected:>= 6.1.03, < 6.1.03.11

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify installed GoldenDB version
    Query the GoldenDB version using the database client or check the installation manifest. Common methods include running 'SELECT VERSION();' or checking the GoldenDB installation directory for version files.
    Affected if The installed version falls within the range >= 6.1.03 and < 6.1.03.11
  2. Verify business user access to system tables
    Attempt to query system tables using a business user account (non-admin). Try commands like 'SELECT * FROM mysql.user' or 'SHOW DATABASES;' as a standard business user.
    Affected if Business users can successfully read or modify system tables they should not have access to
  3. Review role-based access control configuration
    Check the RBAC configuration files or settings that define permissions for business user roles. Look for entries that grant SELECT or other privileges on system databases or tables.
    Affected if RBAC configuration grants system table access to business user roles that should only have business data access
  4. Audit user privilege assignments
    Query the actual privileges assigned to business user accounts using 'SHOW GRANTS FOR user;' or equivalent privilege review commands in GoldenDB.
    Affected if Business users have been granted privileges on system tables or system databases beyond what their role requires

A user is affected if their GoldenDB version is 6.1.03 through 6.1.03.10 and business user accounts can access system tables due to insufficient authorization controls.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 6.1.03.11 or later
Fixed in 6.1.03.11
Interim mitigation

Apply vendor patches for GoldenDB and review role-based access control configurations to ensure business users cannot access system tables.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

6.1.03.11

  1. Verify current GoldenDB version using: SELECT VERSION() or check system tables
  2. Schedule maintenance window for upgrade procedure
  3. Backup all critical business data and system tables
  4. Upgrade GoldenDB from current version to version 6.1.03.11 or later
  5. After upgrade, verify system tables are properly protected and business SQL operations function normally
  6. Monitor system logs for any unauthorized access attempts to system tables

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Zxcloud Goldendb Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation8.0 h
  • Implementation16.0 h
  • Testing12.0 h
  • Review / QA8.0 h
44.0 hours of engineering $7,720
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $12,352.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-46580 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-46580 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data