CVE-2025-4672
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe Offsprout Page Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Privilege Escalation due to improper authorization placed on the permission_callback() function in versions 2.2.1 to 2.15.2. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to read, create, update or delete any user meta, including flipping their own wp_capabilities to administrator and fully escalate their privileges.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Offsprout Page Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to privilege escalation in versions 2.2.1 to 2.15.2 due to improper authorization placed on the permission_callback() function. This allows authenticated attackers with Contributor-level access and above to read, create, update, or delete any user metadata, including modifying their own wp_capabilities to administrator-level privileges.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Offsprout Page Builder plugin is installedLog into WordPress admin and navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins. Look for 'Offsprout Page Builder' in the list of active plugins, or check the plugins directory via file system for /wp-content/plugins/offsprout-page-builder/Affected if The Offsprout Page Builder plugin is present and active in the WordPress installation
-
Identify the installed plugin versionIn WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins and click on 'View details' for Offsprout Page Builder to see the version number, or read the main plugin file header in /wp-content/plugins/offsprout-page-builder/offsprout.php for the 'Version' fieldAffected if The installed version falls within 2.2.1 through 2.15.2 (inclusive)
-
Check for unexpected administrator accountsNavigate to Users > All Users in WordPress admin. Review the list for administrator accounts that were created recently or that you do not recognize, particularly accounts that may have been created by users with Contributor-level permissionsAffected if There are administrator accounts that were not created by existing administrators or that correspond to Contributor-level users who should not have admin privileges
-
Audit wp_capabilities metadata for unauthorized changesQuery the wp_usermeta table for records where meta_key = 'wp_capabilities' and meta_value contains 'administrator', cross-reference with legitimate administrator user IDs to identify any that were modified by non-administrators. Alternatively, use a plugin or WP-CLI: wp user list --role=administrator --allow-root to compare against expected admin usersAffected if There are administrator-level wp_capabilities entries for users who should not have that role, indicating potential privilege escalation
-
Review capability modification events in audit logsIf audit logging is enabled (via WordPress security plugins or server logs), search for events involving updates to wp_capabilities or user_role metadata, particularly those initiated by users with Contributor or Author rolesAffected if Audit logs show user metadata modifications performed by users lacking administrator privileges
A WordPress site is affected if it has Offsprout Page Builder installed with version 2.2.1 through 2.15.2 AND either unauthorized administrator accounts exist or capability modifications were performed by low-privileged users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate the Offsprout Page Builder plugin to version 2.15.3 or later to remediate the authorization bypass vulnerability.
Latest version available on wordpress.org (version above 2.15.2)
- 1. Log in to the WordPress admin dashboard with administrator privileges.
- 2. Navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins.
- 3. Locate the 'Offsprout Page Builder' plugin in the list.
- 4. If an update is available, click 'Update Now' to install the latest version.
- 5. Alternatively, download the latest version from wordpress.org and upload it via Plugins > Add New > Upload Plugin.
- 6. After updating, verify the version number reflects the latest release.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,512.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-4672 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-4672 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data