Improper Input ValidationWeakness · CWE-20

CVE-2025-4680

HIGH · 8.6 CVSS v4.0 Published 2025-06-10
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
86/100
Remediation priority · High

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Improper Input Validation vulnerability in upKeeper Solutions upKeeper Instant Privilege Access allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects upKeeper Instant Privilege Access: before 1.4.0.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Improper input validation in upKeeper Instant Privilege Access allows attackers to bypass or exploit incorrectly configured access control security levels. This vulnerability in the privilege access management system could enable unauthorized users to escalate privileges or access restricted administrative functions.

MitigationUpgrade to upKeeper Instant Privilege Access version 1.4.0 or later to obtain the patched version with proper input validation.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
Authentication
X
User interaction
A
Scope
X

CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm upKeeper Instant Privilege Access is installed
    Look for the upKeeper application in your installed programs list, or check for the upKeeper service/process running on the system. On Windows, use Programs and Features or check Services. On Linux, use package managers or look for upKeeper processes via 'ps aux | grep -i upkeeper'.
    Affected if The product is present on the system
  2. Identify the installed version number
    Access the upKeeper admin console or use the command-line interface to retrieve the version. Typically found in Help > About, or run 'upkeeper --version' if a CLI tool exists. Check configuration files or the installation directory for version metadata.
    Affected if The version cannot be determined or is returned as null/unknown
  3. Compare installed version to the patched release
    Review the version retrieved in the previous step. The patched version is 1.4.0. Compare your version number numerically or semantically to 1.4.0.
    Affected if The installed version is lower than 1.4.0 (e.g., 1.3.x, 1.2.x, etc.)
  4. Inspect access control security level configuration
    Log into the upKeeper admin console and navigate to the access control or security policy settings. Look for security level configurations related to privilege access. Examine XML configuration files in the installation directory for security level parameters. Check for any custom or non-standard security level values.
    Affected if Security levels are set to non-standard values, are misconfigured, or allow privilege escalation pathways

You are likely affected if upKeeper Instant Privilege Access is installed and the version is below 1.4.0, or if the access control security levels are configured in a non-standard or overly permissive manner.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade to upKeeper Instant Privilege Access version 1.4.0 or later to obtain the patched version with proper input validation.

Recommended fix High confidence

1.4.0

  1. 1. Back up the current upKeeper Instant Privilege Access installation and configuration
  2. 2. Download the latest version of upKeeper Instant Privilege Access (version 1.4.0 or later) from the official vendor repository or support portal at support.upkeeper.se
  3. 3. Stop the upKeeper Instant Privilege Access service
  4. 4. Install the updated version following the vendor's standard upgrade procedure
  5. 5. Verify the installation was successful and the service is running
  6. 6. Confirm the version number reflects 1.4.0 or later

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-4680 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-4680 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data