CVE-2025-46849
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.22 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.22 and earlier contain a stored Cross-Site Scripting vulnerability where low-privileged users can inject malicious JavaScript into form fields. The payload persists on the server and executes when other users view the affected page, allowing session hijacking, data theft, or defacement.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.5.23.0< 2025.5.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Adobe Experience Manager installationAccess the AEM Welcome page at /libs/granite/security/content/login.html or check the footer of any AEM page for version information. Alternatively, query the AEM version endpoint at /system/console/components if available.Affected if The system is confirmed to be Adobe Experience Manager
-
Determine installed AEM versionNavigate to Help > About Adobe Experience Manager in the AEM console, or check the version file in the installation directory. Compare the version number against the affected ranges: < 6.5.23.0 for 6.5.x branches, or < 2025.5.0 for newer releases.Affected if The installed version is 6.5.22 or earlier, or falls below 2025.5.0
-
Verify Forms or Core Components are in useCheck if the AEM Forms module or Core Components that render form fields are installed and enabled. Navigate to /libs/granite/ui/components/foundation or check the Forms console at /aem/forms (if available).Affected if Forms or form-rendering components are present and active on the instance
-
Confirm low-privileged user access to form fieldsReview user permissions in the AEM Groups console at /security/groups.html. Identify if standard users or content authors have create or edit access to form components, Adaptive Forms, or content fragments that render in user-facing pages.Affected if Low-privilege users (non-admin) have permission to create or edit form content that other users can view
A user is affected if running AEM version 6.5.22 or earlier (or pre-2025.5.0) with Forms or form-enabled components, where low-privileged users can inject content into fields that are rendered to other users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.5.23.02025.5.0
Apply the vendor patch for AEM 6.5.22 or later. Until patched, implement input validation and output encoding on all form fields, and consider deploying a WAF rule to filter XSS payloads.
AEM 6.5.23.0 or AEM 2025.5.0 (depending on your release train)
- 1. Identify your current Adobe Experience Manager version by checking the product version in the AEM About console or system/console/bundles
- 2. If running AEM 6.5.x version <= 6.5.22, plan upgrade to 6.5.23.0
- 3. If running AEM 2025.x version <= 2025.4.x, plan upgrade to 2025.5.0
- 4. Review Adobe's official release notes and upgrade documentation for the target version before proceeding
- 5. Perform a full backup of the AEM instance, including repository, database, and configurations
- 6. Test the upgrade in a non-production environment first
- 7. Apply the upgrade following Adobe's standard upgrade procedures
- 8. Verify the upgrade was successful and all bundles are in active state
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-46849 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-46849 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data