CVE-2025-46855
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAdobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.22 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceStored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.22 and earlier allows low-privileged users to inject malicious JavaScript into form fields. The injected payload persists in the system and executes in victim browsers when they view pages containing the affected fields.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 6.5.23.0< 2025.5.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Adobe Experience Manager is installedLook for AEM installation directories (commonly in /opt/aem, /apps/aem, or C:\Program Files\Adobe) or check for AEM processes running on common ports (4502, 4503)Affected if AEM is not present in the environment, the vulnerability does not apply
-
Determine the installed AEM versionAccess the AEM Web Console (System > Information) at /system/console/configMgr or check the version.properties file in the AEM installation directoryAffected if Cannot determine version - verification cannot proceed
-
Compare installed version to affected rangesCheck if the version is below 6.5.23.0 or below 2025.5.0. For 6.x versions, look at the 6.5.x line; for Cloud/2025 versions, look at the 2025.x lineAffected if Version is 6.5.22.x or earlier, or 2025.0.x through 2025.4.x - the environment is within affected version ranges
-
Verify Forms or Adaptive Forms feature is enabledCheck if AEM Forms or Adaptive Forms components are installed by reviewing the package manager (/crx/packmgr) for af-core or forms packages, or check the AEM console for Forms functionalityAffected if Forms/Adaptive Forms are not installed or not in use, the specific attack surface may not be present
-
Confirm low-privileged user access existsReview user permissions in AEM User Management (/security/users.html or /libs/granite/security/content/useradmin) to see if non-admin users have access to create or edit form contentAffected if Only admin users exist or low-privileged users cannot access form authoring, exploitation is not possible in practice
You are affected if Adobe Experience Manager is running with a version below 6.5.23.0 or below 2025.5.0 and Forms functionality with low-privileged user access is enabled in the environment.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped6.5.23.02025.5.0
Update Adobe Experience Manager to version 6.5.23 or later; alternatively, implement proper input validation and output encoding on vulnerable form fields to prevent script injection.
Adobe Experience Manager 6.5.23.0 or 2025.5.0 (or later)
- 1. Back up your current Adobe Experience Manager instance, including the repository and database
- 2. Download Adobe Experience Manager version 6.5.23.0 or 2025.5.0 (or later) from the official Adobe distribution portal or Software Distribution
- 3. Follow Adobe's official upgrade documentation for your specific deployment type (tarmk or mongodb-based)
- 4. Run the upgrade using the author instance first, then replicate configuration to publish instances
- 5. After upgrade, clear browser cache and verify the fix by testing form fields for XSS payload injection
- 6. Validate that all custom code and integrations function correctly post-upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,600.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2025-46855 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2025-46855 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data